Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Church Bulletin Out Takes.......enjoy!


Church Bulletins: Thank God for church ladies with typewriters -- misspellings, bad sentence construction or choice of words all make for fun reading. These sentences actually appeared in church bulletins or were announced in church services:


The Fasting & Prayer Conference includes meals.

The sermon this morning: 'Jesus Walks on the Water.' The sermon tonight: 'Searching for Jesus.'

Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. Bring your husbands! It's a chance to get rid of those things not worth keeping around the house.

The peacemaking meeting scheduled for today has been cancelled due to a conflict.

Don't let worry kill you off - let the Church help.

Miss Charlene Mason sang 'I Will Not Pass This Way Again,' giving obvious pleasure to the congregation.

For those of you who have children and don't know it, we have a nursery downstairs.

The Rector will preach his farewell message after which the choir will sing: 'Break Forth Into Joy.'

Irving Benson and Jessie Carter were married on October 24 in the church. So ends a friendship that began in their school days.

At the evening service tonight, the sermon topic will be 'What Is Hell?' Come early and listen to our choir practice.

Please place your donation in the envelope along with the deceased person you want remembered

Potluck supper Sunday at 5:00 PM - prayer and medication to follow.

The ladies of the Church have cast off clothing of every kind. They may be seen in the basement on Friday afternoon.

This evening at 7 PM there will be hymn-singing in the park across from the Church. Bring a blanket and come prepared to sin!

Ladies Bible Study will be held Thursday morning at 10 AM. All ladies are invited to lunch in the Fellowship Hall after the B. S. is done.

The pastor would appreciate it if the ladies of the congregation would lend him their electric girdles for the pancake breakfast next Sunday

Low Self-Esteem Support Group will meet Thursday at 7 PM. Please use the back door

Weight Watchers will meet at 7 PM at the First Presbyterian Church. Please use large double door at the side entrance

Z: Things like these really do get typed...We had a typo in our church bulletin about 4 weeks ago I honestly can't publish here it was SO raunchy!


z

Why believe in GOD? Be good for GOODNESS' sake!!

From the AP: WASHINGTON, D.C. — You better watch out. There is a new combatant in the Christmas wars.

Ads proclaiming, "Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness' sake," will appear on Washington, D.C., buses starting next week and running through December. The American Humanist Association unveiled the provocative $40,000 holiday ad campaign Tuesday....... .....Last month, the British Humanist Association caused a ruckus announcing a similar campaign on London buses with the message: "There's probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life."
Z: Funny, the day I'D be really worried is the very day I was thoroughly convinced "there's probably no God." There's healthy doubt, of course........but imagine living without the promise, the solace, the strength? What are your thoughts on this?

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

INJURED MARINE SEMPER FI FUND.... Our guys are so worth it

I've been hearing a lot about the INJURED MARINE SEMPER FI FUND today on Hugh Hewitt. All afternoon, he's had injured marines telling how MUCH this organization has done for them and their families. They pay for hotel rooms for families to be near their injured soldier, they equip homes with handicapped equipment for wheelchairs, etc., they stay with the Marines through surgeries, offering moral and financial support. Everyone interviewed couldn't say enough about this wonderful PRIVATE (i.e. not governmental) organization.

Whenever you read this, whether it's still Veteran's Day or the day after, please consider sending a little money to this unbelievably important, efficient, and generous charity.

Our soldiers deserve it. Thanks. Z

VETERANS DAY

A Soldier's Prayer
By Jesse J. Sparks

It's time to sleep
I've been relieved

My rifle at my side
My knife in it's sheath

Lord let me live another day
As I put myself in harms way

I made my choice, I took the oath
I stand for freedom, but I don't boast

My God, my country, my family
The things I hold so dear

With these all on my side
There's nothing for me to fear

But if I should fall before my next relief
I will stand before you Lord with honor and dignity

So, while I'm here please make me strong
To fight the battles and right what's wrong

God Bless America

Z: And God Bless all our soldiers, those who lost their lives, those who we honor for having served, and all their soldier families. How can we ever forget them all?

Monday, November 10, 2008

Lindsay Lohan and Swinging Couples.... GOOD for America?


I'm wondering what you think....Here's a bit from the article I linked below. Lindsay Lohan is admitting she's, well...not a lesbian, exactly...but just 'blessed' to feel comfortable with her bartender girlfriend.

"While Samantha is the first woman Lindsay has admitted to dating publicly, when asked if she had previously "been with a girl" by Harper's, the actress replied, "I don't know, maybe."
Lindsay said she does not consider herself a lesbian, but as for whether she thinks of herself as bisexual, she told the magazine, "maybe."
"I don't want to classify myself," she continued. "First of all, you never know what's going to happen -- tomorrow, in a month, a year from now, five years from now. I appreciate people, and it doesn't matter who they are, and I feel blessed to be able to feel comfortable enough with myself that I can say that."
The star of the upcoming film "Labor Pains" also said she plans to get married some day, though she doesn't know whether it would be to a man or a woman."


And then there is the TV Show SWINGTOWN. In the interests of complete disclosure, I don't even know what station it's on, never watched it, but I'm hearing things about it. Here's something I pulled from Google:

"I think even though this show is a little out there, thats what makes it so great. So many shows on right now are all the same. This is a great show and it needs to stay on so there is a little variety on tv.

A rumor of cancellation prompts these comments on a TV Show blog:

"This show is AMAZING and original. The show is unlike many others out today. The storyline is very unique and it is something for people who are outside of the mainstream and are tired of the same old shows/concepts."

"We record and watch on Tuesdays (nothing else is on). I love the 70’s feel and freedom of the show…just what we need today."
Here is a 'recap' of the show and its merits:

"Want to keep your marriage intact? Sleep Around Take It to the Limit - Everyone takes it to the limit one last time -- and only one couple ends the season (and, let's face it, the series) firmly intact. That it's Tom and Trina who manage to hang together says something about the merits of promiscuity."

Z: You know, it just feels like beauty's leaving us....privacy, the sanctity of marriage, decency......it seems to me that societies due better observing some kind of decorum. Someone who thinks I'm worrying too much will predictably suggest that NOT honoring Lindsay Lohan's being featured on the YAHOO Homepage this afternoon is unkind and homophobic. I don't think I'm either. I think it's just sad that we've come to where this is so 'normal', so accepted. She can do anything she wants in private...who cares? I'm wondering if peoples' sex lives aren't always better left in private? Does it REALLY warrant YAHOO HEADLINES?
As for the SWINGTIME TV show, as with DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES (another show I have to admit I have not watched, except for the ad for it which showed a woman having sex with some guy on her dining table), is swapping mates for sex really something we want to champion in America? Again, is it maybe better left in private if one's just got to do it? How many marriages has it HURT?

It's a TONE I'm talking about here.....not really the actions. Everyone knows all of this has been going on since the dawn of man. Is it better OUT THERE? Or is it really pretty destructive in the long run, sort of Roman Empire Fall fodder?

just wondered what you think...Am I getting old, or does this all just sound so cheap?

z

Obama HOLIDAY?


Planning under way for Obama holiday

The Capital-Journal Published Sunday, November 09, 2008

Plans are being made to promote a national holiday for Barack Obama, who will become the nation's 44th president when he takes the oath of office Jan. 20.

"Yes We Can" planning rallies will be at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. every Tuesday at the downtown McDonald's restaurant, 1100 Kansas Ave., until Jan. 13. The goals are to secure a national holiday in Obama's honor, to organize celebrations around his inauguration and to celebrate the 200th birthday of President Abraham Lincoln, who was born on Feb. 12 1809.

At 7:30 a.m. on Inauguration Day, Obama Cake will be served at the downtown McDonald's, and a celebration is scheduled for 8 p.m. to midnight Jan. 20 at the Ramada Hotel and Convention Center, 420 S.E. 6th.

For more information, contact Sonny Scroggins, (785) 232-3761, 845-6148

Z: You might want to give ol' Sonny a call!

Steven Den Beste says it The Best(e)

Election view by Steven Den Beste - November 4, 2008

Not the end of the world (Z's comments, too...)

It's easy to let yourself go in despair and start thinking things like "We are well-and-truly xxxx'd" or "This is the worst of all possible outcomes". But it isn't true. (yes, it is; considering the other outcome would have been Obama losing, this IS the worst of all possible outcomes.)

I think this election is going to be a "coming of age" moment for a lot of people. They say, "Be careful what you wish for" and a lot of people got their wish yesterday. And now they're bound to be disappointed. Not even Jesus could satisfy all the expectations of Obama's most vocal supporters, or fulfill all the promises Obama has made. (I'm very sure Jesus could, but that's beside the point. The rest is absolutely true....how many times did we try to tell Americans "be careful what you wish for?)

I think Obama is going to turn out to be the worst president since Carter, and for the same reason: good intentions do not guarantee good results. Idealists often stub their toes on the wayward rocks of reality, and fall on their faces. And the world doesn't respond to benign behavior benignly.

But there's another reason why: Obama has been hiding his light under a basket. A lot of people bought a pig in a poke today, and now they're going to find out what they bought. Obama isn't what most of them think he is. The intoxication of the cult will wear off, leaving a monumental hangover. (And this pig never DID have lipstick on)

And four years from now they'll be older and much wiser.

A lot of bad things are going to happen during this term. But I don't think that this is an irreversible catastrophe for the union. I've lived long enough to absorb this basic truth: the US is too large and too strong to destroy in just 4 years. Or even in 8. We survived 6 years of Nixon. We survived 4 years of Carter. We even survived 8 years of Clinton, God alone knows how.(Well, terrorism and Iran's nukes could give us a run as far as surviving 4 years, but I'm hoping this guy's optimism is right)

The President of the United States is the most powerful political figure in the world, but as national executives go his powers are actually quite restricted. Obama will become President, but he won't be dictator or king, let alone deity. He still has to work with the House and the Senate, and he still has to live within Constitutional restrictions, and with a judiciary that he mostly didn't appoint. (He didn't get that senate majority but he's already planning to overturn Bush's stands on stem cell and gobal warming and he can slide those right by.....facts aren't important to these people; WE know embryonic cells haven't worked as other stem cells have but this is about abortion, isn't it, not stem cells, "got to kill those babes".......he also belongs to the group of nonthinkers who don't find it odd that NO invitations to the big Bali Warming convention went to those who do NOT feel this latest warming is mostly caused by humans! THAT's open minded, right? AGENDA, this is all agenda..not thoughtful decisions based on ALL the information..that's scary)

The main reason this will be a "coming of age" moment is that now Obama and the Democrats have to put up or shut up. Obama got elected by making himself a blank slate, with vapid promises about "hope" and "change" -- but now he actually has to do something. Now he has to reveal his true agenda. And with the Democrats also having a majority in both chambers of Congress, now the Democrats really have to lead. And they're not going to do a very good job of it. It's going to be amusing to watch. ("amusing" isn't the word I'd use, but it'll be interesting, that's for sure!)

And the people who fell for the demagoguery will learn an invaluable lesson. (they deserve it)
Oh, the Democrats try to blame failure on Republican filibusters, of which there will be many. But that's always been a factor in our system, and many people believe it's an important check on government excess. The tradition in the Senate is that it is supposed to be a buffer against transient political fads, and the filibuster is a major part of that. (this is why I begged obama voters to please consider voting for the Republican senator or congressman...when did Americans stop believing in checks and balances?)

If the Democrats go all in, and change the filibuster rule, then they'll have truly seized the nettle with both hands and won't have any excuses any longer. That's why they won't do it. It's their last fig-leaf. But even with the filibuster rule in place, they'll be stuck trying to deliver now on all the promises implied, or inferred, during this election. The Republicans can only filibuster on bills the Democrats have already proposed.

And it ain't possible for the Democrats to deliver what's been promised. Gonna be a hell of a lot of disillusioned lefties out there. A lot of people who felt they were deceived. A lot of people who will eventually realize that the Obama campaign was something of a cult. Disillusionment will turn to a feeling of betrayal. And that will, in turn, convert to anger. (What a mix; heartbroken conservatives and disillusioned lefties..)

In the mean time, Obama and Congressional Democrats will do things that cause harm, but very little of it will be irreversible.

I would have enjoyed watching lefty heads explode if McCain had won. But we're going to see lefty heads exploding anyway; it's just going to take longer.

In the mean time, those of us who didn't want Obama to be president have to accept that he is. And let's not give in to the kind of paranoid fever dreams that have consumed the left for the last 8 years. Let us collectively take a vow tonight: no "Obama derangement syndrome". Obama is a politician. He isn't the devil incarnate. (Ya, I know..."don't say it, Z!") So what are the good sides of what just happened?

1. It is no longer possible for anyone to deny that the MSM is heavily biased. The MSM have been biased for decades but managed an illusion of fairness. That is no longer possible; the MSM have squandered their credibility during this campaign. They'll never get that credibility back again. (Even the Washington Post admitted it today!)

2. Since the Democrats got nearly everything they hoped for in this campaign, they'll have no excuses and will have to produce. They'll have to reveal their true agenda -- or else make clear that they don't really have any beyond gaining power. (Their true agenda is to make America mediocre, "America doesn't deserve to be the world power..")

3. Every few decades the American people have to be reminded that peace only comes with strength. The next four years will be this generation's lesson. (So, WE know we have no strength left when obama's in power....how long will it take for Iran to find out? Oh, that's right, they already wrote congratulating obama on their luck...I mean HIS luck, sorry.)

Now, a few predictions for the next four years:

1. Obama's "hold out your hand to everyone" foreign policy is going to be a catastrophe. They'll love it in Europe. They're probably laughing their heads off about it in the middle east already.

2. The US hasn't suffered a terrorist attack by al Qaeda since 9/11, but we'll get at least one during Obama's term.

3. We're going to lose in Afghanistan.4. Iran will get nuclear weapons. There will be nuclear war between Iran and Israel. (This is the only irreversibly terrible thing I see upcoming, and it's very bad indeed.)

5. There will eventually be a press backlash against Obama which will make their treatment of Bush look mild. Partly that's going to be because Obama is going to disappoint them just as much as all his other supporters. Partly it will be the MSM desperately trying to regain its own credibility, by trying to show that they're not in his tank any longer. And because of that they are eventually going to do the reporting they should have done during this campaign, about Obama's less-than-savory friends, and about voter fraud, and about illegal fund-raising, and about a lot of other things.and

6. Obama will not be re-elected in 2012. He may even end up doing an LBJ and not even running again. (Z predicts he will be impeached in ...3 years..Yup, I do. There is NO WAY he can survive while not living up to ALL the HOPE AND CHANGE he promised...he'll have angry people to face who'll make Bush haters look like Bush lovers)

One last thing: I'm not saying I'm happy with this outcome. I would much rather have had McCain win. But this is not the end of the world, or the end of this nation. We've survived much worse.And now we need to show the lefties how to lose. Our mission for the next four years is to be in opposition without becoming deranged. (This will be difficult!! no..downright impossible)

UPDATE: One other good thing: no one will be spinning grand conspiracy theories about this administration's Vice President being an evil, conniving genius who is the true power behind the throne. (I'll take 'evil and conniving' as long as 'genius' is part of it....with biden, we only have the 2 two....oh, and DUMB) and I still think his first paragraph was right...we really ARE "well and truly XXX'd"z

z

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Is Mr. Bush REALLY giving early clearance to Obama team people? Please let me know...

The German media has reported that President Bush, in an effort to be kind and accomodating, has given full White House security clearance to approximately 100 obama workers. This is a first. Apparently, this never happens until the official Inauguration Day and so I wondered if anybody else had heard about that and what your thoughts are on this. Mine are not printable.

President Bush also has said that he wants to help obama 'hit the ground running' because his will be a 'wartime presidency'.. "Wartime presidency? Obama's?" Does Mr. Bush know how obama feels about the war? I found this from his recent speech about the election results: "We've provided intelligence briefings to the President-Elect, and the Department of Justice has approved security clearances for members of his transition staff. In the coming weeks, we will ask administration officials to brief the Obama team on ongoing policy issues, ranging from the financial markets to the war in Iraq. I look forward to discussing those issues with the President-Elect early next week. "

Does nobody vet anybody anymore? I guess if we can have an unvetted president, we can have unvetted staff members, huh? But, at a time when terrorism is lurking? We have a president-elect who couldn't pass security clearance, we have a staff being rushed in by the justice department, and we have this next president who's promised ACORN they would all be invited to the White House before his inauguration to "help me shape the agenda." It seems to me that Mr. Bush has just made it that much easier. ... I'm not against Bush, I just question this move; tell me I'm wrong.

(you all notice how giddy Mrs. Bush looks these days? I so can't blame her!)

UPDATE: This is the kind of people we're dealing with as far as 'diversity' that obama's supposedly hoping to implement: "Podesta also said Obama is working to build a diverse Cabinet. That includes reaching out to Republicans and independents — part of the broad coalition that supported Obama during the race against Republican John McCain. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has been mentioned as a possible holdover.
"He's not even a Republican," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said. "Why wouldn't we want to keep him? He's never been a registered Republican."

That's showing a real will to reach across the aisle, isn't it!? Man, that Reid is REALLY quite a guy, huh?

z

Cartoons sometimes say it better!


Want to get MUGGED? Here's a piece from Mug Center,...


We'll start with glib, bordering on corny: The candidate I voted for didn't win the election, but I know God can use the results to make this a better, holier country. I know the current president-elect scares the devil out of me.

Sticking with glib: McCain made a very magnanimous concession speech Tuesday night. Would that he made it six months ago. Let's hope that next time the Republicans don't nominate the candidate the New York Times tells them is "electable".

If I can wax serious, I'd like to turn to 1954 and the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. In this case the Court ruled that the racial segregation of schools is unconstitutional. As Thomas Sowell, black man and preeminent economist-philosopher-scholar-political commentator, described the scene, people all around him were celebrating uproariously, while his reaction was much more reserved. If I may try to characterize his opinion, he lamented the fact that so many around him thought that educational and economic improvement for blacks could be brought about by a legal decision. He knew that true improvement for blacks had more to do with attitudes of personal responsibility.

I found it curious that Sowell had such a tepid reaction to this landmark decision, but on this election night, I felt like I had a better idea of what he was saying. I spent that night in Manhattan close to Times Square. The reaction there was almost a unanimous celebration. There was honking and screaming in the streets past 1 AM. Are people celebrating because they expect an Obama presidency to facilitate some improvement in their lives, or was getting Obama elected the end goal? During Obama's victory speech, he told supporters that they have brought about change to Washington. Chants of "Yes we did" went up. Obama has yet to take office so it's not even sensible to expect him to have brought about change. While viewing the election results, an Obama supporter told me that Obama had a clear mandate. "Mandate to do what?" I asked. That was not so clear.

As repulsive as it is to our senses as it is that a vote would be contingent on the candidate's race, I think there are positive consequences of having elected a black president. I think the claims that America is a racist country ring a bit more hallow. As Deroy Murdock (a black columnist) has pointed out, Obama has shown the black community that they can succeed if they are educated, speak good English, and are clean. (I don't think Murdock used the word "clean". I think I got that from Joe Biden.) Perhaps the Obama economic plan will have to worry about creating two more jobs than it had originally intended: one for Jesse Jackson, one for Al Sharpton.

Regarding the Palin pick, I think McCain is indebted to her for giving him a fighting chance. Is she the most qualified person to lead the conservative movement? I doubt it. Unfortunately, the system requires a certain rock-star persona to appeal to the uninformed voters who are encouraged so strongly to make their uninformed voices heard. Laffer curves and talk about judicial restraint are boring. Playing saxophone on the Arsenio Hall Show really shows your qualifications.

I'm finding myself more attracted to the commentators who criticize the obsession with the undecided voters. As a rule, these are not people you want deciding the next leader of the free world. One blogger mentioned someone who claimed to be a pro-life, single-issue voter but was still undecided. A post-debate forum of undecided voters included one who criticized candidates for not giving enough information, yet the voter didn't know the names of the vice-presidential candidates. I don't think he was doing a whole lot to seek what information was available to him. Anyone else in favor of "Get the vote out--of the election process" campaign to end ignorant sufferage?

Looking for a silver lining in this election? California voted to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, overturning the best efforts of an activist state court.

Shall we end on a sinister note? Obama will become the fifth POTUS of the last seven to be left-handed. (From Ford to W, only Carter and W were right-handers.) McCain, by the way, is also a southpaw, as was Ross Perot. The only other lefty presidents were Garfield, Hoover, and Truman. The disproportionate number of lefties in the last 35 years as compared to first 190 is probably the result of the earlier insistence on forcing everyone to be right-handed. Why have there been so many lefties of late? A clandestine lefty lobby controlling us patriotic right-handers? Is there a connection with right-brained (left-handed) people being more inclined toward politics? I don't know, but I hear Mike Huckabee read a Reader's Digest article on left-brain/right-brain.

Obama will probably join Carter and Clinton in a rather special club. As Ann Coulter said--did you hear she has a book coming out at the end of the year?--it's been as if Carter and Clinton are in a competition to see who can be the worst ex-president.

Today's word's were the (definite article), worst (superlative form of bad) and ex-president (former president).

You've just been mugged.

(This was written by a friend and I'm hoping he'll be getting us more pieces like this at geeeeeZ! thanks, M!)

z