Saturday, February 6, 2010

Palin is scaring the Left witless, but she could be their best friend

Is Sarah Palin eyeing the Tea Party Movement's nomination for 2012?

I thought THIS ARTICLE was interesting. Suddenly, as she gets more powerful, Associated Press writes about how much Palin's husband Todd had to do with her governing of Alaska. There are apparently many emails which show he was frequently included in decision making and gave suggestions. They quote him here:

"Have Meg take the news miner off the press release address list for a few days,see how long it takes them to realize their not on the list," Todd Palin wrote to his wife in an e-mail, dated June 21, 2007, after the governor questioned the fairness of an editor in Fairbanks Daily News-Miner."

Odd that the AP picked the one email with a grammatical mistake, isn't it? :-) My GOSH, the left is scared witless of the Palins, isn't it. BUT, they really should be glowing about her and making her look GOOD because she could do to the Republicans what Ross Perot did to them some years back and lose 2012 to Obama, throwing this country even more deeply into the hideous leftwingers' dream they're all hoping for. She could badly divide the Conservatives ... the Lefties should be happy. It's a great way to drive the final nails in the coffin of America.

z

Friday, February 5, 2010

SUPER BOWL FOOD....come on, GIVE!

So, it's SUPER BOWL SUNDAY (bully :-) I'd rather watch the LAKERS!
WHAT will you be EATING? (is anything more important?) Please come to Mac 'n GeeeeeZ and share your favorite football food!

Prayers to the Snowbound


I snagged this from Always On Watch's blog post on their situation with the snow storm coming in.
(COMING IN? What do you call THAT picture taken already? :-)
God bless all of you facing big snow falls...that you keep warm and safe and even find blessings in the quiet and in your homes with family, etc.
Special blessings to the Always On Watch household with their special needs. xxx Z
Now, please read the post below, THAT'LL get you FIRED UP in the cold!

Barack and Bolsheviks? And they finally got something on Palin!?

Perspectives Of A Soviet Immigrant (No. 6)

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Chuck Thinks Right.......Our Country doesn't

Sometimes I see a blog post that REALLY bothers me....THIS was one of them, by excellent blogger and my good buddy, Chuck, from Chuck Thinks Right. When that happens, I think I'll just put some music on that helps me mask what's happening to our country. That's all. Enjoy the music. Read Chuck's information at your own risk. Maybe with alcohol. :-) Boy, are WE up #(*&#*(& Creek, or what?

The music helps. It's better than putting your hands in your ears and saying "yadda yadda yadda" for the rest of the day.

Hear Z on Gathering Storm Radio Friday

I'll be on Gathering Storm, Always on Watch and WC's radio show, at 3:30 EST (LA time, 12:30pm) It'll be me and Always talking about THE MEDIA. Call in, we always have a good time. You'll want to tune in first at 3:00 EST to hear John of Culturism, he's a very smart, good guy with a very interesting subject. I hope to hear you there! thanks..Z

The Taliban...a fascinating insight....what do YOU think?

If any of you, too, think and worry about terror attacks or our soldiers over there fighting muslim extremists and wonder where all this is going, please READ THIS. I'd very much appreciate your considered and thoughtful opinion. Please read the whole thing, it's eye-opening, it's educational and quite interesting. Thanks so much.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Andrew Young tells all...........Should he?

A Mr.Andrew Young has written a book about John Edwards. Here is a timeline of what his life was like working for Edwards up until the present, when he is decidedly not working for (or speaking to) the Edwards anymore. Apparently, the liberal Huffington Post blog tried to belittle Andrew Young saying, in its article title, "Andrew Young's CRIMINAL RECORD and the John Edwards Scandal" The biggest problem with the title is it makes this man who had finally dared quit the Edwards imbroglio sound like he's a felon when, in actuality, he had some DUI's, a lien, and a traffic offense over 20 years. "CRIMINAL RECORD", well, technically, but you know how that headline is meant to sound and so do I. ANYTHING to slam an Edwards defector, apparently. So, sounds like I'm sticking up for this guy and I am not.

I know Yahoo and Google would never stick up for liberal causes (Ya, right), but I Googled "Andrew Young John Edwards Book" and was on page six of Yahoo's Search page and still hadn't come to an Amazon.com link! I found THAT odd :-) Finally, I put in the information I just mentioned AND Amazon.com and finally found it there on the second link down (!)...... HERE, if you want to get this book which most of the reviews say cannot be put down even if you don't want to read it.
I don't think I'll read it. My main purpose was to ask you all what you think of his having written the tell-all that REALLY does seem to tell ALL. I won't go into the details because many of you have probably seem him interviewed by now and we know most of the story, anyway, but what are your thoughts on it? He has a seemingly lovely wife and 3 children to support, he's out of a job and shunned by his leftwinger friends now (though, to be fair, many leftwing pundits are as disgusted with the Edwards story as any of us are), but .......even though it's a leftwinger and I should be having the glee and fun with it our leftwing friends have used against Conservatives, it makes me kind of queasy and I think he's gone a bit too far. What do you think?......Should he have done this?
By the way...I watched a bit of THE VIEW this morning where they interviewed the Youngs....Joy Behar can't understand him having written this book when the Edwards had lost a child years ago...."shouldn't that make them sympathetic characters?" I'm not kidding.

z

Scott Brown's Request today

Wouldn't you like to know what the votes are which are happening before his February 11 swearing-in which have made him desirous of being sworn in tomorrow? I would. Let me know if you all find out, please!
And, please let me know what YOU think of NO below....Thanks! z

Republicans: PARTY OF "NO"

I don't know about you, but I'm getting real sick and tired of the following Obama mantra of the last three months or so. He spoke today to Democrats and the AP covered it (link below) and it included this Obama quote:

“The challenge that I gave to Republicans, and I will continue to issue to Republicans, is if you want to govern then you can’t just say no,” Obama said today. “It can’t just be about scoring points. There are multiple examples during the course of this year when that’s been the case.”

You see, his idea of 'just say no' is different than Nancy Reagan's idea. Maybe he hasn't said 'no' enough to her subject over the years because the very idea that all Republicans do is say NO for "scoring points" is a pipe dream (see illustration :-) He kept going on and on about the PARTY OF 'NO" until only a week or so ago, when the Republicans finally held up a hard copy of their bill with which they'd tried to engage Pelosi and Reid for months; he seemed to either not know the ideas Republicans had for health care or he had known but didn't like them and couldn't allow anybody to let the public know they're there (with media complicity, of course), or he didn't want the Republicans getting involved at all for his own political conceit.... because they've been there, you all know they've been there (Portability, tort reform, tax benefits, etc etc). He still hasn't addressed their ideas...and that's "the party of NO". ??? Who's REALLY "Just saying NO" here?

Here's another fascinating quote from the article Associated Press printed about the Democrat meeting:
"Obama used the same language toward Republicans as he did toward extremists in the Muslim world in his inaugural address. Of Republicans on Wednesday, he said, "We extend a hand and get a fist in return." In his inaugural address, he said the United States "will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist."

MUSLIMS? He runs a risk here....most Americans hear MUSLIM and go negative and think even their hero president might have gone too far here.........but some Americans seem to think Republicans aren't too much better than extremist Muslims and so it'll resonate with them. Very clever man, our president. Do you all understand that his words are hollow, that he says these things about "NO" and "FISTS IN RETURN" for THE PUBLIC TO HEAR? It's important he keeps this up because his personality ratings are still fairly high, it's his agenda ratings which are down and, since people still like the guy, they hear this information about Republicans and continue the ridiculous generalizations the leftwingers have been perpetrating for years; these are the people who don't look so much into the veracity of what he said but they sure do like him, so.......... It's extremely effective to the huge majority of the American public which isn't schooled anymore in looking at both sides, that huge part of the population who don't even know there is another side if they're stuck on CNN or the networks. Of course, today, more and more, they are starting to SEEK both sides our mainstream media doesn't provide, which is why FOX is doing so unbelievably well in the ratings. Maybe it's the Tea Parties which awakened this interest. You have to hope that some Americans who weren't too interested see the thousands of Americans attending those gatherings and wonder "wassup?" I hope so.

THEN THERE IS THIS QUOTE FROM THAT ARTICLE:
"Some of the transparency got lost," Obama said. "And I think we paid a price for it. So it's important, I think, to constantly have our cards on the table."

GOT LOST? You mean in those Democrat closed sessions dealing with the business of all Americans? Those meetings you barred Republicans from, Mr. Obama? Those press conferences during which HELEN THOMAS complained about the lack of TRANSPARENCY in the WHITE HOUSE and got laughed at by Press Secretary Robert Gibbs? Firing Van Jones late on Friday night, etc.etc........... that TRANSPARENCY?

If that's transparency and that's how you're ruling, then let ME be the first to say "NO"
z