Saturday, January 25, 2014

Is Our Government Trustworthy?

We have to begin this conversation with the revelation of inappropriate close coordination between Democratic politicians, executive branch appointees, and leftist activists. Recently discovered are emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request submitted to the Environmental Protective Agency by the Energy and Environment Legal Institute. As a result, we learn that there has been an ongoing, behind the scenes, campaign by the Obama Administration to stop construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. 

The emails seem to demonstrate that senior policy officials at the EPA are working closely with leftist environmental groups in an effort to implement a progressive agenda that does not benefit the American people.  


If we attempt to respond to the title of this post's question based solely upon what we know about these behind-the-scenes arrangements, then our answer is likely to be negative: our government is not trustworthy. It is a logical inference, but who knows if there is not far more to the story than simply a conspiracy to defeat the Keystone XL Pipeline. What we mean to say is that there is always the possibility that the Obama Administration (EPA) is merely seeking independent advice from the Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the National Wildlife Fund.  Or, that pigs can fly.  

On the other hand, perhaps we should wonder why our federal government is behaving subjectively rather than objectively in the interest of all Americans and every group, whether left or right. It is enough to lead a reasonable citizen to conclude that our federal government is dishonest and corrupt.  It makes us wonder why we even have an EPA if we cannot trust its motives or have confidence in its objectivity. ( Link)  

Possibly, the basis of our concern should not be this singular question of Obama’s corruption, noting that we already offered alternative possibilities, but rather the weight or frequency of indices of corruption.  Not long ago, a former high-ranking official within the EPA told members of Congress that before he left the agency, he was working on a project examining ways to modify the DNA of our capitalist system.  (Link)

We wonder ... we really do.   And then there's THIS STORY, which also talks about environmental questions which we'd have thought deserved some conversation?   Z keeps saying "Why's the leftwing so censorial?" , and it continues on and on.

- Mustang and Z 


50 comments:

Sparky said...

This is the most corrupt, heinous, disgusting, untrustworthy Administration in the history of our country, but, that said, all they are doing is reflecting the majority of our populace. Our country is in full-blown degeneration free fall. Sadly, it appears that those of us who believe in Jesus Christ are now the minority. "It's dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."

Jarhead said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
American Jihad said...

Psychiatrist calls liberals mentally ill!

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, “The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness.” “Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

•creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;

•satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;

•augmenting primitive feelings of envy;

•rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

More:
Veteran psychiatrist calls liberals mentally ill

Jarhead said...

I'm sorry, but the people deserve to know the truth about crimes and to get to the bottom of all these scandals that this failed Obama administration IS responsible for.
What is amazing to me is that it took over 5 years for a majority of Americans to see it. It's not he just started lying, when most of us knew that by the end of Obama's first year that this entire progressive bunch were exactly what they are today. . My God it's like watching one of the most smart nations in the world turn totally stupid and totally Untrustworthy! Obama has proven that he cannot be trusted. It doesn't take a scholar to know this. How do you trust anyone who admits he knows nothing about anything.
And by the way, Moochelle. how about waking up to reality, It's been almost a hundred and twenty five years since anybody alive has been responsible for slavery, and YOU can’t let it go... You and your husband just can’t miss any opportunity to stop playing the race card, can you?
It shows that in order to be a liberal you have to be a complete blithering idiot, or a criminally insane sociopath!!! Or both!!!

Good post Mustang and Z.

skudrunner said...

I don't believe the Obama administration is the most corrupt in history but it is in the top three. You do need to remember Nixon was not above coercion the biggest difference is he actually did something.

As long as the press is pro BHO, he will get away with most anything. They allow him to promote instead of prosecute the people who have performed illegal activity and lied about it.

It is amazing how Holder is still running around suing people after the incompetent incumbent kept him from being held accountable for illegal gun sales that resulted in an American death.

Seems that the only killings that don't matter are American's.

sue hanes said...

Z - Is our government trustworthy?
I believe that the president starts out sincerely and dependable but as time goes on he gets less and less so. It's not as easy as it looks and things enter in that makes him less dependable and honest. It's a hard job.

Anonymous said...

Skud, you can tell that to your progressive friends, but we ain't buying any of that here!!!!!

Uncle Sugar said...

"Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., like Michael Savage, thinks that liberalism is a mental disorder.

Unlike Savage, however, Rossiter is a psychiatrist and is actually serious when he says that. He has written a book, The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness, which claims to trace the psychological factors causing people to become liberals.

In a nutshell, the book's thesis is, "My political views are so obviously correct that anyone who doesn't accept them just has to be nuts."

It presupposes the truth of a right-wing political outlook and then tries to plumb the reasons why other people do not accept this truth, the conclusion being that they have to be in massive denial. He chastises liberals for being "uncivil, overly sure of their correctness, and willfully ignorant of facts that contradict their worldview."

Joan Swirsky, a fan of the book, notes that it "avoids all the usual psychobabble." We hazard that this is because the book does not contain any actual psychological science."

Duckys here said...

Emails obtained recently through a Freedom of Information Act request submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency by the Energy and Environment Legal Institute exposed a slice of that coordination in the campaign to stop construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.

The emails show, according to Fox News correspondent John Roberts, "senior policy officials at the EPA working closely with environmental groups in what appears to be an effort to kill the pipeline."

===========
Wow, "according to Fox News reporter", "what appears to be". Makes you think they'd publish the e-mails and back up the claims.

When they do that revisit this. Otherwise you've got nothing.

As for the film. It received theatrical release. Mark Cuban ran it o his cable network and a small film festival decided it was funded by energy companies. Nothing particularly unusual.

Z said...

I do wish they'd allowed Fracknation to be shown at the Frozen River Festival. It's just more leftwing cenoring, darn!
They had the anti-fracking film shown.
Then they said it was because the Fracknation maker wasn't there...and that was not a condition of the film's being accepted, which it had been.
These are tough times.

I guess you all heard Schumer say that the IRS should crack down HARDER on Conservatives, particularly anything to do with the Tea party. WOULD that they'd crack down on Tides and all the other Soros foundations/thugs who're working behind the scenes. Oh, but of course there are few links; who's want THAT broadcast? :)\
Actually, I think the public may turn quicker than we'd though on lefties after hearing Schumer; I'd have never thought the left would even think that Americans don't usually NOT APPROVE of anything the IRS does, let alone asking it to ramp it up....which is a good thing. Thanks, Chuck!

Duckys here said...

Schumer has a point. We desperately need campaign funding restrictions.

We should start by not letting him pimp for the hedge funds.

beakerkin said...

Duncy

This administration has taken pages out of the Hugo Chavez playbook. It is never okay to use the agencies of the government for vendettas against political opponents.

Something I have dealt with on a different level is younger employees exaggerating stuff to make a name for themselves. I have a great disdain for those seeking to create numbers that mean nothing. When the work is flawed it merely hits another desk at a later moment. Do it right the first time or don't bother.

Anonymous said...

From Z:

Schumer handed it to Republicans...NOBODY likes the IRS and for a liberal Dem to suggest the IRS needs to come down harder on one group is un-American and vile.

Campaign funding restrictions is another subject than today's.
Nobody disagrees with that.

beak...be more specific...!

Everybody: Another mall shooting....anybody notice they've probably averaged one a week for the last, oh, five years.......? Odd. we NEVER heard of them this often...ever. And it's mostly since the left's tried to mess with the Second Amendment, too. Really odd.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Transparency:
http://allenbwest.com/2014/01/youre-kidding-even-ny-times-editor-says-obama-admin-secretive/

When the editor in chief of the NYT talks like that (yet not loudly) you wonder if the facade is cracking.

Ed Bonderenka said...

I'd like to see Fracknation on HBO, the heck with some podunk film festival.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Anonymous said...
Skud, you can tell that to your progressive friends

Anon: Did you read his comment?
Doesn't sound like a man with progressive friends.

Anonymous said...

Ask him, he'll tell you that I'm right, and you're wrong.

Ed Bonderenka said...

OK, Skud, you got a lot of progressive friends?

Skudrunner said...

He must be talking about my posting on Shaw 's blog.

Anonymous said...

Z:

Ed,the point isn't where it's shown; you're right about that...56 leftwingers will be there, so who cares? But the censorial Left is REALLY coming out of their closets and it's so reminiscent of dictators and tyrants...amazing.
Now they're after D'Souza...Huckabee, the ridiculous Cuomo remarks , the Schumer Tea Party remarks (tho I think he played into our hands), Beck again and again (who deserves it half the time, I'm so not a fan), ...it's Name that Republican and they'll get them.
And the media plays it for DAYS and this is all about 2014 midterms, let's not kid ourselves....they'll get even uglier and uglier.

Anonymous said...

Z:

Skud; I'm going to have to delete your very last comment (yes, that one...trust me) unless you'd do me the favor while I'm here at work and can't.
Thanks!

Anonymous said...

From Z of GeeeZ to "Uncle Sugar"...boy, it didn't take you long to grab that screen name, did it.

I don't think it gets us anywhere saying leftists are mental. I don't think they all are; however, I do agree with the quote about incivility, overly sure of their views, etc...
And I suppose if you're begging for freebies and actually think any society can survive with INCOME EQUALITY being strived for, you ARE mentally ill....mentally ill being defined as "doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results"..it's NEVER WORKED, DOPES!

The most distressing thing now is their inability to have a conversation without belittling the other side. It's the lies about Koch and ignoring Soros, it's the lie that "leftwing 501s were targeted, too" (when so few were)...
This morning I actually heard someone say "Well, now you SEE that Hollywood isn't LEFTWING...Friends of Abe has Voight and Senise and Grammer in it"...Can you BEAT THAT? THREE big names, so suddenly Hollywood's not liberal? I really cracked up.

By the way, I'm familiar with that group. Clint Eastwood's in it, too. And a bunch of great young comedians and actors and producers who literally JUMP when a door gets opened at luncheons....one said "I'm always sure paparazzi are going to storm in with cameras and I'll never work again.." I can't tell you the horrid stories I've been told by really good young wannabes with tons of talent.
But, alas........Leftwingers are censorial.


Sue...I don't believe Obama gave us any reason to think he was sincere or dependable...and he's shown he's not...and you know I don't like saying that to you.

Bob said...

As stated in the article, I don't have a problem with an administration working with groups outside the government. With the Obama Administration, the sin is not who they consulted, but they contrived to hide the association.

Ducky is outright wrong in his opinion that the Fox News reporter was somehow outside his/her area of expertise with their judgement of the purpose of the charade.

The problem is that only advocacy groups were consulted, and secretly at that. We all know that the Obama Administration has ignored scientific and economic evidence in the XL Pipeline scandal.

Obama is a slave to his ideology, endeavoring to force his misguided ideas on the American people whether they are wanted or not. Don't confuse Obama with facts. They don't matter.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Bob! For the win!

Duckys here said...

Ducky is outright wrong in his opinion that the Fox News reporter was somehow outside his/her area of expertise with their judgement of the purpose of the charade.
----
I said no such thing.

I stated that an accusation without the text of the e-mails means NOTHING.

Get it straight.

Anonymous said...

From Z:

Bob's right, of course...gee, Ducky, and you always write such love letters about FOX being biased as you tout THE NATION as fact that Bob erred in thinking you were attacking ONCE AGAIN...silly, Bob :-)

You see, Ducky, as Bob said; when things are done secretly on the left, it's very difficult to get the information to reveal them. That's the happy thing about being a lefty in America with a lefty media.
Also, one must never only consult one side for facts when one knows there is validity to the other side, too.

Again, the pull-back on the acceptance of FRACKNATION at a small film festival isn't so much about the festival (who's heard of it other than some esoteric film freak who only appreciates leftwing fodder, anyway?) but that they pulled it....that, again, a film with FACTS is pulled because the FACTS aren't attractive to the sponsors of the festival. tsk tsk tsk

One learns nothing that way...one's country suffers.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Z: " as Bob said; when things are done secretly on the left, "
Did you read the link to the Allen West post claiming New York Times Executive Editor
"Jill Abramson says that President Obama’s White House is the “most secretive White House” that she’s covered during her long tenure as a political journalist. “

Anonymous said...

From Z:

Ed, I didn't read that link, but I did see the headline yesterday online.

I think even some liberal journalists have the integrity to want to know what's really going on and to expose it, but would they work again? FOX would hire anybody that honest and conscientious, but not many would go that far to stoop to FOX after the ridiculous name calling of it even by a sitting president.
IMAGINE a PRESIDENT insulting talk show hosts and the largest cable channel in the world? IMAGINE him and other liberals with bully pulpits saying it's "not really news," etc? They're so afraid of it.

I'm fearful of how far they'll go this year with the midterms coming.
HOWEVER...some of my readers know I've often said it'll be a LIBERAL who blows this White House's cover because there ARE Liberals with some journalistic integrity (ok, maybe it's just journalistic curiosity, but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt) and they just might FINALLY tell the truth......I'm counting on one...or maybe three because one can be silenced easier. it might take a number of them getting together.

Woodward's book was apparently pretty revealing of some Obama White House antics, but the media didn't really cover it. SURPRISE!!!
You'll never get anybody like Doris Kearns telling all...and she knows..........or Eleanor Clift..never....Juan Williams does sometimes but, as you know, he had to go to FOX to make a living after telling HIS truth on NPR!! ugh. I could go on and on and so could you.

back to work!

Sam Huntington said...

Journalists often cite materials gained through the release of materials resulting form petitions under the Freedom of Information Act. The only way they actually print these materials is when someone calls into question the veracity of the information. What this proves is that Ducky is a complete moron—and I do mean moron in every sense of the word. Moreover, he is a dishonest moron because I have no doubt that if the article had said, “Julian Dingbat, a reporter form MSNBC said today …” then it would have been perfectly acceptable to Ducky “as is.”

Waylon said...

Is our government trustworthy?

Absolutely NOT. And I wouldn't only apply that response to this Obama administration.

Does anybody recall Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador from the Bush years, who suddenly was recalled to Saudi Arabia back in the day?
Seems he might have disappeared from the spotlight (or in his case shadows) of the American media but has resurfaced in a big way seemingly speaking for the good old U. S of A. And speaking to none other than Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding "terrorist threats" at the Sochi Olympic Games.

Here are some quotations from this meeting:

" “There are many common values and goals that bring us together, most notably the fight against terrorism and extremism all over the world. Russia, the US, the EU and the Saudis agree on promoting and consolidating international peace and security. The terrorist threat is growing in light of the phenomena spawned by the Arab Spring.” Here we must note it was the West which drove the Arab Spring."

"He continued: “We have lost some regimes. And what we got in return were terrorist experiences, as evidenced by the experience of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the extremist groups in Libya.”

The second and most shocking is this: ”As an example, I can give you a guarantee to protect the Winter Olympics in the city of Sochi on the Black Sea next year. The Chechen groups that threaten the security of the games are controlled by us, and they will not move in the Syrian territory’s direction without coordinating with us. These groups do not scare us. We use them in the face of the Syrian regime but they will have no role or influence in Syria’s political future.”

So Chechen terrorists, who supposedly carried out the attack in Boston and have killed hundreds of Russians including Russian police officers, are being controlled by the US and the Saudis? And what is more the Saudis and the US are admittedly controlling terrorists in Syria? And lastly this arrogant “Prince” has the audacity to threaten the president of the largest country in the world with terrorist attacks if he does not do his bidding?"

"Bandar attempted at first to bribe President Putin with promises of oil and gas deals, arms purchases and more, to pull Russian support for Syria. He then moved on to the threats of attacks on the Olympics by the Saudi and US' terrorists.

President Putin responded by saying: “We know that you have supported the Chechen terrorist groups for a decade. And that support, which you have frankly talked about just now, is completely incompatible with the common objectives of fighting global terrorism that you mentioned. We are interested in developing friendly relations according to clear and strong principles. Our stance on Assad will never change. We believe that the Syrian regime is the best speaker on behalf of the Syrian people, and not those liver eaters.”"

The Bushie, after failing in all attempts to get President Putin to pull his support for Assad then responded by saying: “… there is no escape from the military option (in Syria), because it is the only currently available choice given that the political settlement ended in stalemate. We believe that the Geneva II Conference will be very difficult in light of this raging situation.”

And today we are on the eve of an invasion because a terrorist Saudi Prince wants to protect the petro dollar and kill all Muslims who are not Sunnis.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_08_29/Bandar-Bush-threatens-President-Putin-with-Sochi-terrorist-attack-2596/






Liberalmann said...

Earthquake-rattled Texas town begs state to shut down fracking wells

http://ozhouse.org/2014/01/24/rachel-maddow-earthquake-rattled-texas-town-begs-state-to-shut-down-fracking-wells/

Z said...

Sam....D's comments are almost hard to read, aren't they? Blathering on SO biased and accusing everybody else of stupidity and bias...

Waylon; wait...you're saying that because the West drove the Arab Spring (and we might have, with talks of democracy, etc.), that they're behind Syria and maybe even the Sochi threats?

I will say this, though:

I don't believe the German government is caving to muslim expectations of HUGE and unmerited welfare payments to their people, ignoring the deaths of naturalized Germans and not taking jihadists to court, and other things without SOME REASON.

I don't believe our government has SO many muslims at the White House and is bending over to denounce Christianity from schools, the town squares, etc., for NO REASON.

I have always said that Islam just HAS to have a big threat that only government officials are informed of or this wouldn't be happening.

Islamists know our political correctness is total weakness and naivite...and they're COUNTING ON IT...and I believe threatened BIG TROUBLE if we don't bend.
I think that's one reason we haven't had more terrorist attacks.......we're doing their bidding as are the Germans, French, etc.

Let's see if Scandinavian countries which are finally waking up to the problem muslims start getting any big problems..

Z said...

Libjerk; good try.
2.6 was the highest magnitude. Have you felt a 2.6? No, you won't. If you were living on top of one, it'd be mild. Nothing even falls down.
Have you felt a 6.6? THAT is an earthquake.
Thank goodness the tremors haven't hurt anybody; good information to have.

Now take a deep breath and THINK: do you want to live in a country where only side's news, facts and figures, are released? Where movies are pulled from film festivals because the leftwing proprietors don't like their facts? WOW.

Ya, well..YOU probably do, come to think of it. We Conservatives believe in hearing everything and THEN deciding for ourselves any conclusions or votes.

Thanks for the information...the slight tremors have been happening since 2010...all accounted for in spite of them!

Waylon said...

Z, I find it quite bizarre that Prince Bandar bin Sultan (aka Banadar Bush) would be in Russia apparently "negotiating" with Putin and the bargaining chip offered is so-called peace at the Sochi Olympic Games.

I had thought this dirt bag Bandar Bush had disappeared into the woodwork like the cockroach that he is, but obviously he only moved on to be a world ambassador, likely supporting the globalist network.

Impertinent said...

@Z:

""Hydraulic fracturing almost never causes true earthquakes," he told the group gathered for the National Research Council workshop. "It is the disposal of fluids that is a concern."

Texas has 10,000 injection wells, Frohlich said, and some have been in use since the 1930s. That effectively makes the state a giant research lab for the shale-gas drilling issues now facing Appalachian states including West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York.

If injection wells were "hugely dangerous," he said, "we would know."

"Texas would be famous as a state that just rocks with major earthquakes," Frohlich said. "That is not true."

Mustang said...

I am impressed with the fact that LibJerk’s primary sources are all far left loonies. Well, okay … I was lying. He isn’t at all impressive. On the other hand, if he were running around with his hair on fire, THAT would be impressive.

Z said...

Waylon..it's heartbreaking...the Saudis are ruling and winning, apparently.

I've always wondered why, as busy as they are promoting Islam all over the place (thru this negativity, of course, keeping in true form) they don't help the "Palestinians"...instead of prodding them to keep scratching Israel's scabs because the "poor Palestinians" are suffering, why not the heck GIVE THEM MONEY!?? Let them raise their kids productively instead of hating Jews?? Just a thought.

The worse thing America EVER DID was promote the Saudis FINDING the oil in their sand.......at least Mr. Z used to say something close to that. I think he was right.

I don't know about Bush and Banadar but I did resent the ridiculous left and some on the right saying he was 'in bed' with the Saudis because he'd taken the guy's hand....it was the polite thing to help him walk in a dress through the garden, etc........I admired it.

Z said...

Mustang, same as Ducky.
At least some of us link to leftwing sources from time to time.....
I love when Ducky slams FOX and then sites THE NATION as gospel :-)
Libjerk...the apple doesn't fall far from the liberal tree. He's just never thinking...just spouting.

hair on fire? Ya...:-)

Waylon said...

... according to Fox News correspondent John Roberts, "senior policy officials at the EPA working closely with environmental groups in what appears to be an effort to kill the pipeline."

----

I always thought that John Roberts was left leaning when he was at CNN. I'm not sure why he moved to Fox News. The 'missus' is still at CNN as far as I know.

But I think his take on Keystone is correct and there is way too much government interference there.
It's even harder to believe that a private company would invest the large amounts of money required without having the proper permits in place to go ahead with the construction leaving a huge stranded investment sitting there idle, as we speak.

It's possible this is just an extension of the war against Canadian energy being waged by the Tides Foundation and the Rockefeller ("charitable") Family trusts.

Mustang said...

@ Z

There is a profound difference linking to sources, and linking to credible sources. Madcow—not so much. Ducky’s favorite is the Daily KOS. Lots of independent reporting over at the Daily KOS … and if I had to take a wild guess, I might be inclined to suggest as many as two non-pro-leftist stories over the last twelve months. You have to admit … that is a lot.

beakerkin said...

Z

Younger officers like high profile cases. The more criminal or convoluted the better. This is okay if you are sending the right people to the immigration judges. It is not a good idea when the paperwork is done on 90 year old people with no criminal record.

Also waivers exist for a reason. Officials naturally alter the criteria depending on what infraction. For example a violent criminal or a sexual offender is going to face a harder time than
a person with fraudulent papers.

Unfortunately, I am now the person making the calls. The supervisors and the attorneys understand that I use moderation and common sense.
If the waivers can be rewritten with better logic then I will direct the attorney. In some cases
it was just not taking a clear look at the family situation. It is better than the courtroom shuffle where nobody wins.

Duckys here said...

@muang ---
There is a profound difference linking to sources, and linking to credible sources. Madcow—not so much. Ducky’s favorite is the Daily KOS.
-----
Maybe the exalted one can give us his template for deciding just what constitutes a credible source. Trying doing it without some simplistic reference to freedom.

By the way, one of my favorite on line sources is the daily howler. He can't stand Maddow and I don't have much use for her either.
But carry on. Pity that your use of stereotypes seems to extend to the totality of your thought.

Z said...

Ducky, you just can't have said that.
Do you honestly not realize how you constantly diss anything conservative as 'not a credible source' only in rougher, more insulting terms?
do you REALLY not realize that, or are you forgetful or ..........what?

Kid said...

Where to start, where to finish. Well, there is no finish. From day 1, obama and friends have lowered the bar on a daily basis.

I'll just toss this out, and say this is not even a snowflake on the tip of the iceberg.

michele obama's friend's company CGI, previously acclaimed with running a lemonade stand, gets a no bid contract to create a website. Over the course of two years, the company is paid a BILLION dollars in direct and indirect funding to create a website my boss and I would have been ecstatic to get a contract to do for 10 million and would have delivered a working website. I know this because we delivered a working website to our company that has 100 times more functionality than the healthcare.gov POS. And it works.

The delivered product was defective from end to end, wasn't even 50% complete, was insecure to a point of professionals not being able to describe it without their jaws falling off, was back-ended by former convicts, rife with identity theft holes and didn't conform to HIPPA. People should be in jail. A BILLION and the media calls it a couple glitches. Can you IMAGINE what the media would have done if a non-democrat was in the white house when this went on, let alone the other 10,000 things...

My full comment in reply to this subject could only be complete if I wrote an entire novel. So, I'll stop here.

@Z, I think it IS important that liberals are officially classified as mentally ill. This would either eliminate them from being able to own firearms, or would take away one major weapon the government intends to use on the population to take firearms away from them. Putting them in a category of having a mental illness.
Ever take a valium or other mood altering drug prescribed by a doctor? Ever complain of 'restless leg syndrome'? No firearm for You if they are able to enact this legislation. I'm not kidding.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Kid +1

Z said...

Kid, ya, I see your point about mental illness!

As for CGI, that's probably a bigger coverup than F&F, Benghazi and the IRS all put together.

NO media coverage has gone toward even investigating the very obvious fact that friends got that project for MANY more MILLIONS than YOU and IMP could have charged creating a running website.

Why didn't they hire Amazon.com's bunch or something...? Or Google? They're big LIB friends of Obama; maybe they'd have done it well and cheaply....

CGI screwed it up, cost a fortune and NOBODY CARES on the left.

amazing.

"a couple glitches"...yes, and when Obama lies it's "I was INARTFUL"... they have such euphemisms on the left and sharpen their teeth for the slightest Republican questionable behavior or phrase.

Ben Gazi said...

Why does that Commie at Progressive Eruptions refer to you ( Z )as a Gee Oh Pee-er?

Waylon said...

To add insult to injury: CGI isn't even an American company. Its head office is in Montreal.

It seems to be one company that seeks business from governments. It is famous for screwing up a gun registry in Canada that never worked and was way over its original bid price with atrocious cost over runs. And the so-called product never did work properly.

Just business as usual as far as I can see. And that Mrs. Obama was "in" with one of the executives is also par for the course when the remnants of capitalism have devolved to corporatism.

Liberalmann said...

TransCanada Pipeline Explosion Shuts Off Gas For 4,000 Residents In Sub-Zero Temperatures

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/01/26/3205971/transcanada-gas-pipeline-explosion/

Z said...

Waylon, I forgot that part about Canada! yes, is that WILD? And so typical of the Obama WH?

Imagine how hard they must be laughing at us in there? They're laughing at this situation, they're laughing at those who think they're worried about healthcare when it's pretty obvious they're happy as pigs in mire that the things a screwup so they can HAVE to go to single payer...they're laughing at his starting to go around Congress and start signing actions the people don't want and he even ADMITS it "I can't work with congress, so I have a pen and .."

Oh, ya..they're laughing BIG TIME.

disgusting bunch of unAmerican thugs.