Monday, April 2, 2012

Obama threatens the Court .........

So Obama says that if the Supreme Court finds the Health Care Bill unconstutional, they're ACTIVISTS?   Is he kidding?  Is this only said for the public?  There's so much I could say, but I'll let you do it....................what's your opinion?

HERE is the article...........Here's part of it:  "I'm confident this will be upheld because it should be upheld," the president said Monday afternoon at a White House press conference that included ‪Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon, who are attending the North American Leaders' Summit. The president said overturning the law would be "an unprecedented and extraordinary step" and compared the court's rejection of the law to "judicial activism."

He has VERY smart people behind him feeding him just what to say to make Americans believe he's right.  The man doesn't take NO, no matter what it is.  He's furious, he's belittling and making a mockery of the Supreme Court which DID ACCEPT THIS CASE OH, but now that it might not go his way....hell to pay.


MAN.
z

40 comments:

Impertinent said...

The fraud mocked the Supremes once before at SOTU address. And he lied as Justice Alito / Roberts shook his head to affirm it. And they're not forgetting that this "law" professor knows squat about the law or the balance of power.

And they won't forget to teach this power hungry Marxist a lesson in how this country is governed.

Talk about "activist" judges...Not one damn peep when the commies of the 9th circuit strike down laws legally voted on by people.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Just keep talkin' Dude. Just keep talkin'.

Sam Huntington said...

For someone who is a constitutional lawyer, Obama seems rather dense respecting the role of the Supreme Court. It is the job of the Supreme Court to act as a check against absolute power, either by the President, or the Congress —both of whom all too frequently step outside the bounds of the Constitution.

But we cannot dismiss Obama, or the communists in congress, as being merely stupid people. They are not that. They know exactly what they are doing … and what they are doing is everything they can to circumvent the Constitution. Owing to the idiots who vote in this country, and elect communists to the presidency and Congress, the Supreme Court is our Republic’s only safeguard.

Does anyone recall when Obama said the Constitution was just an old piece of paper? Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ginsberg believe this, also. Remember folks, if the government can make you take out their insurance, they can make you do anything. Overturning this law is what the Supreme Court must do if we hope to remain free from totalitarian government. Getting rid of Obama is the next step, in November.

Ducky's here said...

I kind of enjoy it. No one's distaste for this right of center dickhead surpasses mine and it will be nice to see his presidency reduced to nothing of progressive value.

This bill was an utter pile of rubbish and nothing more than a giveaway to insurers who the fringe right are happy to feed till they are thoroughly bloated.

Did nothing to address rising insurance costs and we go on with the utter insanity of for profit health care.

The dude sure does love his militarism though so I don't see why the right wig loons are so down on him.

Impertinent said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kid said...

A liberals liberal accusing judges of being activist. That's richer than rich. As I said they will say anything - do anything.

Who wants to bet me if the SC rules against oblabbercare, he just ignores them.

Duck, here's a little education for you. Our company group insurance went up 50% as a result of oblabbercare.

oblabbercare was created to put the insurers out of business so all that insurer money would be re-routed through Washington DC.
You need to learn to think beyond step one. As most liberals do.

Why are us [intelligent life, liberty, pursuit of happiness] right wing goons down on him?

Because he is a teleprompter reading communist imbecile, never worked or accomplished anything in his life liberals liberal Dictator. Plus he's an asshole. Just FYI.

Silverfiddle said...

Just to set the record straight, Obama was not a professor. He was a lecturer.

He also never tried any cases so far as I know.

This is just what we should expect from a product of the corrupt Chicago Democrat Machine.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Reading Ducky's comments left me feeling a bit surreal. Maybe it's like a contact buzz.
If Obama keeps talking like this, he's gonna get Ginsberg to vote against him!

Carol............. said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKi28eZ1UiU&feature=player_embedded

Get a bit of a laugh....this is totally how I see him.

Rita said...

That is hilarious Ed!

Elmers Brother said...

You do make him look like Ronald Reagan duhkkky

Elmers Brother said...

Even the premiums on Tricare are going up by as much as 345% in am effort to get vets to jump ship ...and the Dems have been very open about that

Z said...

Imp..."And they won't forget to teach this power hungry Marxist a lesson in how this country is governed."

I hope so.

"Talk about "activist" judges...Not one damn peep when the commies of the 9th circuit strike down laws legally voted on by people."

GREAT point, Imp.

Sam.....Oh, no, they are NOT stupid, they're cunning and focused with their mission.
Did you know this about Ginsberg?:

"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. "I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/06/ginsburg-to-egyptians-wouldnt-use-us-constitution-as-model/#ixzz1qwDBGNs3

She said ""I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. "I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done."

"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. "I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done."

Right, S Africa which, since Mandela, has become a place where you can't walk at night...it's a MESS.
By the way, while I was researching that quote I'd seen in a video, I saw a leftist site whose headline was something about Limbaugh lying about Ginsberg denigrating the constitution :-)
You can't make this stuff up.

Ducky, you're so far left you don't even recognize leftist politics...wow.

Kid, don't waste your breath; ducky thinks obama's a moron, too...because he's not left enough.

SF is right..he was NOT a professor. He also only MAYBE wrote one piece for the Harvard Law Review but they MADE HIM EDITOR!
And, what publisher do you people know which would publish an unknown 40 yr old's autobiography of not having done anything in his life? TWO books ...who paid for THAT?


Rita, that is funny, isn't it!

CS..thanks; great job he does!

Z said...

Elbro...they have Americans convinced it's GOOD to have prices go up! Up in gas, up in insurance, up in EVERYTHING because they're working on making only the RICH PAY, so WHO CARES? :-)

viburnum said...

The president stressed that the judges are "unelected" ...

And a "constitutional law expert" doesn't understand why that is?

"..and noted that the law was passed by a democratically elected Congress."

Or that one the functions of the Court is to determine constitutionality?

I'm beginning to think we need to bring back literacy tests. Not for voters but for candidates for public office. We could have math questions too. Like "How many zeros are there in a trillion?" Of course if the answer to that ever became common knowledge there would be a politician, lobbyist, or bureaucrat hanging from every lamp post in Washington.

Ducky's here said...

Duck, here's a little education for you. Our company group insurance went up 50% as a result of oblabbercare.

------

Post hoc ergo propter hoc?

Doesn't really matter. As long as you have for profit insurers operating with an antitrust exemption you are going to get reamed.

Bend over and enjoy.

"And it's not going to change,
It's not going to change,
It's not going to change,
Til you wise up."

Pris said...

Wow, when you have a Supreme Court Justice such as Ginzberg, who has the temerity to attack our Constitution which only created the greatest country the world has ever known, we're even in more trouble than I thought. And that's saying a lot!

So now what. Are we supposed to welcome the lack of freedom? How about the fact that because of our Constitution, it was the people of this country which made it great, because the government was purposely held to a minimum of control over the people.

She just doesn't get it. She evidently believes the people don't deserve the rewards they created living their lives free to succeed, and seeking what they chose to seek.

Ducky, wisdom is acquired, and those of us who believe we can achieve happiness being free to choose, have learned through hard work and sacrifice, that profit is a positive force which contributes to economic success, and incentive to succeed.

Too bad you don't get it. It's obvious wisdom isn't part and parcel of the left. You believe in mediocrity, third world status, and equality in poverty.

I'd tell you to wise up, but it's too late for you. Your stuck with an inability to be wise, and too old to change after years of being stuck in the 1960's!

Z said...

MARBURY V MADISON

Where has Obama BEEN??

Liberalmann said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Liberalmann said...

The SCOTUS stopped a recall and appointed Bush President. You bet they're activists.

But I hope they play right into Obama's hands. Strike down HCR all together and go for Single Payer!

Z said...

Oh, typical, mention the SCOTUS and the liberal can only go to how "Bush stole the election due to the Justices"....man.

The truth is:

No Justice on the Florida Supreme Court was a Republican appointee, but three of them concluded that the recount that Vice President Gore wanted was unconstitutional.

Z said...

EVERYBODY:

Please check out Liberal"man"'s comments on my post (under this one) of video of the Dane showing Obama, time after time after time, saying how EVERYBODY's a CLOSE ALLY and likening ALL of them to boxers :-)
He sees a video with his own eyes of Europeans pointing out to the world what an honest American media WOULD do if it were honest, and STILL doesn't get it; this is why we could have obama ruin the country for another four years.

HELP! :-)

viburnum said...

Liberalmann: "The SCOTUS stopped a recall (sic) and appointed Bush President."

So sorry you didn't like playing by the the rules.

There's still no joy in Mudville about Casey only getting three strikes either.

Jan said...

Sam said:

"Owing to the idiots who vote in this country, and elect communists to the presidency and Congress, the Supreme Court is our Republic’s only safeguard."

And, somehow, that's downright frightening.

As awful it is to even think it, I think he can get, and do, just about anything he wants.

And they know it.

Joe said...

President BO (the child president) is about desolving the concept of freedom and the separation of powers.

That is who he is, and that is what he intends to do.

If he is re-elected, he will assume power that nobody can presently imagine.

It truly will be his last election, and the Russians will then be able to rest easy, knowing that they have a Communist ally in the U.S.

As for liberalman's inability to understand the video, he can't help it. He is incapable of rational thought.

Z said...

Joe, that's probably true ... imagine seeing with your own eyes and not believing?
It almost hurts me to see foreigners 'get' the awfulness of Obama better than our people because our people actually aren't hearing so much of what he's doing and what he says.

Jan, they sure DO know it.

Viburnum, and imagine the Florida court NOT being full of Republican justices BUT who 'sided' with Um...er...A REPUBLICAN!
That makes as much sense to a Democrat as their saying Republicans are racist though they..um..er...supported so heartily Herman Cain and Alan West...

ah, well! Maybe it IS a mental disease? :-)

viburnum said...

Z: " ah, well! Maybe it IS a mental disease? "

At the very least a deficiency. Lacking perhaps some sort of intellectual growth hormone that traps them in mental adolescence.

That would account for the old saw about 'being liberal at 20 is proof that you have a heart, and being conservative at 40 is proof that you have a brain". ;-)

Opus #6 said...

Enjoyed reading Ducky's comment about how much he dislikes Obama almost as much as I enjoyed reading Kid's rebuttal. Excellent!

Music On Fire said...

There is a constitutional crisis brewing that will rock this nation of dumbasses to it's core. The shite heads who elected this commie piece of shite, because they wanted their first "black" president, (WHAaaaTT), should have instead, looked into "the content of his character". O'Hussain is a rotten piece of commie shite.

Music On Fire said...

There is a constitutional crisis brewing that will rock this nation of dumbasses to it's core. The shite heads who elected this commie piece of shite, because they wanted their first "black" president, (WHAaaaTT), should have instead, looked into "the content of his character". O'Hussain is a rotten piece of commie shite.

Right Wing Theocrat said...

He treats all of you like you are idiots, anyone with half a brain would know lefties love judicial activism when it suits them.

And I must say his reason for declaring obamacare constitutional - because he said so - also speaks volumes about the ignorance and/or hubris of the man.

Always On Watch said...

I was aghast last night when I watched the video of Obama out of bounds and speaking about a pending case before SCOTUS.

I was so stunned, in fact, that I shut off my computer and went to bed, then pulling the covers over my head.

In my memory, no sitting President has even done such a thing.

This morning, I woke up angry. And, yeah, this morning I've posted on the topic.

Unknown said...

Duck, Insurance costs are up because of the regulatory jack boot of oblabbercare. Not Insurers profiteering as you absurdly claim.

Additionally, private insurers actually provide a service, and even with oBAMa's jackboot on their necks still give you a choice of who to give your money to in return for potential health cost claims. The competitive nature of private industry Still provides for best price. Frankly, I'm amazed these people are still in business with the vampired frenzy of ambulance chasing trial lawyers feeding off the system like packs of jackals on the Serengeti Plains.

Contrast that with what you will have if oblabbercare stands, which is one source health provider being the government and all your choices and cost competition disappear along with the best health care statistics in the world and you somehow think that's better. You should lock yourselve(s) up in rubber rooms and leave sane people alone.

Z said...

Unknown..thanks, Well said!

AOW, I feel the same way anymore when I hear Obama talk..mostly because I KNOW Americans buy into his crap because of his reasoned, calm voice and authoritarian pauses, etc.
THis morning he quoted Lincoln as if he'd been a socialist...very hard to take.

And yes, what he did to the SCOTUS is unprecedented (except for himself, and he's slammed them a couple of times in public) and devastating to the Third Branch of Government....I don't think he gets that our lives aren't to be represented by BULLIES who threaten and misrepresent the things we honor.

viburnum, I used to think that mental illness/leftwing thing was stupid hyperbole, but, more and more, I don't.
You have to really have a deep HATE for yourself to constantly be looking for the worst in everything our country's done, to believe indoctrination of kids is a good thing, to feel gov't has to tell you how to live...it's a disease.

RWT, good point about declaring constitutionality...and then INSULTING our Judicial branch?

Music on Fire...I love your screen name, welcome you here, and thank you for your excellent comment.

Liberalmann said...

He sure called them out and rightly so. The SCOTUS would rather side with corporate America that helping average Americans.

Z said...

lib, we Conservatives think the constitution is more important and that we legally must help others, not go against the laws of the land, but thanks...you are predictable, I'll give that to you.

Always On Watch said...

Z,
Have you seen THIS and THIS?

OUCH!!!

FairWitness said...

I don't see the judicial branch of the federal government abiding President Obama's contempt for them. His agenda will brought to a screeching halt across this nation and all its federal courts. The judicial branch is one third of 3 co-equal branches and they have just as much power as the other two branches. President Obama can make all the demands and attempts at intimidation he cares to. Don't expect them to bow to him, they don't have to. They have their own power and authority.

Impertinent said...

"that helping average Americans."


Your "average" Americans are in Sanford looking for some more laws to break...more racism...more incomprehensible street justice...more chaos...more disorder and more people to lynch.

And they don't need no stinking judges...no stinking courts or juries....either. Truly...Holder and Obama's...."people".

Go ...be with your comrades dipshit.

Liberalmann said...

So it's ok with the loony right that the SCOTUS ruling allow strip-searches for ANY arrest?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/us/justices-approve-strip-searches-for-any-offense.html?_r=3&partner=rss&emc=rss

And of course, it was the wingnuts on the bench who rammed this through.

So how about that loser Thomas who should recuse himself in the HCR hearings since his wife makes hundreds of thousands lobbying for the tea party against it?

Get real, guys.