'2010 Was Not A Good Year To Be President'
Yes, 2010 was long ago and far away. As we look back on history, it appears that some Presidents had easy ride- times of growth and stability. Teddy Roosevelt, Warren G. Harding, Dwight Eisenhower, Bill Clinton come to mind. Those were good years to be President.
Others were elected just when the Republic was facing terrible crises: Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and George W. Bush. They rose to the occasion, even though they were controversial and widely hated while in office. Not such good years to be President.
Just a few years prior, in 2008, the country began foundering. We were in the sixth year of the Iraqi Occupation, and the economy was flat. The mainstream press clearly wanted a Democrat elected. Although we didn't know it until some years later, oil producing nations had colluded to secretly buy their own oil on the open market, driving oil prices to shocking levels above the true demand price- reaching a high of $162 a barrel in October, 2008, just before the general elections.
Their purpose was simple: to effect regime change in the United States. And of course, the U.S. economy was already in a real estate slump and also suffering the curse of stagflation; slow growth and high inflation. There were a million home foreclosures. Independent truckers went under by the thousands. Airlines failed. Airlines with names now long forgotten: United, Delta, Northwestern, American. All now merged, of course, into the one lone U.S. carrier we love so much: Southwest.
Against this backdrop of weariness of the war on terror, and economic distress, the American people were ripe for a demagogue, and they certainly got one in Barack Hussein Obama. He and his running mate Kathlene Sibelius inspired them with vague notions of hope and change; of a world in which diplomacy settled all international problems, of free universal health care, of abundant alternative energy, of peace and love. It was a vision too good to resist.
The Republican nominee, a name you probably haven't heard in years anyone? Yes, it was John McCain, an obscure Senator from Arizona had no clue how to run a national campaign, and a platform nearly as liberal as Obama's. The selection of Condoleeza Rice as his running mate looked brilliant at first. Unfortunately, black voters viewed her as white, and women voters viewed her as one of the guys. Even so, the McCain/Rice ticket would have won the election if it weren't for the fact that 16 percent of conservative Republicans voted for... anyone remember? That's right, Bob Barr (Z: or Chuck Baldwin), another name that's a footnote in history.
After Obama's narrow win, thanks to recounts in Broward County, Florida, the country was positively giddy. A Democrat House, Senate, and President. At last an end to gridlock in Washington. Camelot!
When Congress convened in January, 2009, the 44th President of the United States did something unique in history: he made good on his campaign promises. Certainly most Americans never really thought he was serious during the campaign. But whether because of inexperience, idealism, or simply incompetence, he followed through.
In Obama's first One Hundred Days, the Congress passed his initiatives, and he signed them into law as he said he would. He repealed the Bush tax cuts, and increased capital gains taxes. He enacted a windfall profits tax, and instituted price controls on gasoline and diesel fuel. He passed universal health care, which added an additional 10 percent tax increase on all working Americans. He signed the Immigrant Amnesty bill which created 12 million new citizens instantly, each with entitlements. He closed the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, and summarily released all the detainees.
He repealed the Patriot Act, and cut funding for espionage, and eliminated all terrorist listening and wiretaps. Most important, he began the complete and immediate withdrawal of all American troops from Iraq. He ignored the advice of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who wanted to retain bases in Kuwait and Qatar. Instead, he went with the recommendation of Secretary of Defense Dennis Kucinich, and ordered all troops back to U.S. soil. Viola!
In One Hundred Days, by May of 2009, it was all done, and the vision was complete. He did exactly what he said he would do.
And so it was in the summer of 2009 that things began to unravel for Obama.
Of course, the economy needed a tax cut, not an increase, and unemployment quickly rose to 12 percent. Even attorneys and economists were put in the bread lines. Hard times. Price controls on gasoline immediately led to shortages and gas lines.
The global cooling trend we have seen for the past 25 years first became obvious in 2009, exposing the CO2 global warming fraud.
People were justifiably angry. Federal deficits increased massively because thousands of baby boomers, facing job loss and much higher taxes, simply gave up and took social security. Although the superb U.S. health care system was thrown into disarray, the bright spot was the creation of the Federal Department of Health care, and the immediate hiring of 250,000 administrators, inspectors and auditors, the only job growth in any economic sector in 2009.
By February 2010, the U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq was complete. It was a very expensive undertaking. And then in March, the gradual Shiite insurgencies from Iran turned into a true Iraqi civil war. In May, Iranian tanks crossed the border and quickly took Baghdad. Although the exact number is not know, at least 230,000 Sunni Iraqis died as we stood by Iran also quickly moved into undefended Kuwait.
President Obama did exactly what he said he would. He sent Secretary of State Maria Cantwell to Tehran to meet with Iranian President Ahmadinejad. After two weeks of high level talks, the United States agreed to allow Iran to retain Iraq and Kuwait to create stability in the middle east, with the understanding that Israel would not be disturbed. Cantwell returned to Washington, and explained the agreement in her famous speech, in which she proudly noted that the Obama administration had finally achieved 'peace in our time' in the Middle East.
So there was some surprise at the rocket attacks on Tel Aviv on August 14th. President Obama said, 'This is not the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad I knew.'
The Obama administration decided it would be de-stabilizing to take sides in the conflict, and approximately 29,000 Israeli civilians died during the summer and fall. American Jews were appalled at the inaction. Yes, in 2 010 most American Jews were Democrats, but because of 2010, they are solid Republicans today. As awkward as it was, everything might have turned out all right for the Obama administration going into the fall mid-term elections of 2010, if it hadn't been for the dirty bomb in the Port of Long Beach.
The administration had cut funding for the inspection of containers, because they felt it showed a 'lack of trust' in the international trading community. It wasn't really a very big bomb, and thank goodness, not a real nuclear device, but nonetheless it contaminated some expensive real estate- Newport Beach, Palos Verdes Estates- and ultimately caused the death of 14,000 Americans. People were especially annoyed that Disneyland had to be closed for decontamination.
And so, in the midterm elections, Republicans regained control of both the House and Senate, and the rest is history. The impeachment proceedings against President Obama for 'failure to protect and defend' were swift and nearly unanimous. Vice President Sibelius resigned. Newly-elected Speaker of the House, J.C. Watts, became the 45th President of the United States.
But you know the rest of the story well. Republicans finished the war on Islamic fundamentalists, largely by aiming ICBM's at Mecca and Medina. No Democrat has been elected President since. Republicans have held both Houses of Congress. History of Western Civilization and Economics are now taught in all public schools, and in English only. Marriage is defined as one man and one woman. And there are border fences, north and south.
By the way...I SURE WISH I KNEW WHO WROTE THIS PIECE...IT WASN'T ME!
55 comments:
A nightmare scenario, followed by real good news. Well-written!
Morgan
ISN'T IT JUST, Morgan? Sure wish I wrote it!
REALLY good news, indeed..and rather realistic, IF we can get that far safely.
A sobering assessment indeed. I agree Z, the recovery from the multiple disasters would in all likelyhood, be fraught with great difficulties and dangers, and leave the country with scars that would take many years to heal.
In other words the result of conservatives gaining long term leadership, would not be worth the price paid by our country.
Fortunately this is merely an assessment and assumes Obama wins and that he could accomplish all that he has said he wants to do.
Most newly elected Presidents learn very quickly that they're constrained by world events, domestic realities, political pragmatism, and Congress.
However, there's an election coming up. It's not over, 'til it's over.
Yessirree, a sobering assessment. It's enough to make one take to drink
Pris
Z I left you another recipe, I hope you give it a try and LIKE it! It's homemade Fries and curry sauce.
Morgan
After I took Pris’ advice, I re-read the essay and sobered up again. Most people are oblivious to the fact that dark forces are at work from within and without our country. The election of Barack Obama will cause us so much misery, but in addition to that, I have no doubt that we are going to be attacked again – and brutally. That alone will ensure the end to the Democratic Party, but as already pointed out … at an extremely high cost of lives and resources. But you know, if the American people are as stupid as to elect Obama, we have no one to blame but ourselves. This, I honestly believe.
Semper Fi
UGH! Too horrific to even consider Z. I may not support everything McCain - but he is all we've got and he will get my vote. I will vote the lesser of the two evils and right now it's John McCain.
G-d help us all.
Mustang wrote:
"That alone will ensure the end to the Democratic Party"
From your lips to His ears Mustang. You write exceptionally well. I like your opinions.
Morgan
I've believed all along an Obama presidency with a Democratic congress is going to do a lot of damage to the Dems. Damage it will take them awhile to recover from. The problem is, we as a country, are going to suffer more. We are still trying to recover fully from the liberal Supreme Court in the 70's. So while I love the idea of them taking one on the chin, we simply can't afford it.
Z,
Let's just hope Dumbo doesn't get elected.
I don't think Obama has a chance, but stranger things have happened.
This is a page from an article that appeared (will appear) in the August 2037 issue of American History magazine.
I originally traveled back in time to stop it from happening, but I figured, screw it.
Life won't be so bad after the food riots of 2014 end.
WVDoTTR..that was the thing I thought about this piece..the disasters from an Obama presidency would be FAR worse than this,sadly.
And your point about doing what you can to get McCain elected is an excellent one...
WE HAVE TO GIVE MONEY, FOLKS. GOD, I have to consider that because I've been SO TICKED OFF at the Republican party! BUT...time to bite the bullet and GIVE GIVE GIVE.
GIVE MONEY TO THE McCAIN CAMPAIGN, FOLKS....Obama's getting PLENTY. (from Soros, probably)
And start PRAYING HARD!!! Even if you're an aetheist..you NEVER KNOWWWW>>>!!!
Thanks for posting this, Z.
Dennis K. for Sec. of Defense...eeeek! I could beat him in arm wrestling.
Not the Ahmadinejad I knew...I can so hear Obama saying that.
The piece is good, although I also think the end results of an Obama win to be a bit optimistic. If Obama wins the damage that will be done cannot be overestimated!
Thanks for the link, Z. I returned the favor. Of course, since you are "Z", your link is the last one. :)
That's a really insightful piece. I wish I could agree with the endnote. Like you, z, I wonder if America could ever recover from this man, Obama. There's a different feel to him than many of the other odious presidents like Clinton and Carter. Optimism is a great thing though.
Good post "Z"
and your point is well taken
very well written, z, no matter who wrote it. but the withdrawal from the middle east would be much faster than indicated. i sort of get the impression from reading obama that in "siding with the muslims" he might just leave our fine men and women there to fend for themselves with no money for munitions and no support. make it easier on himself and have fewer people to bring home...
we do need to support mccain in more than just lipservice. i gave, holding my nose, but i gave. and probably will again...
hits home because the possibilities of this happening are too true... let's pray this is just a good imagination at work instead of a prophesy!!
Funny....I have one of those desk calenders someone gave me with biblical quotes for every day....
Usually, I don't look every day and have to tear a chunk of 6-9 days off at the same time, but today I looked and it seems fitting to this post, no?
II Corinthians 1:7
"And our hope of you is steadfast, knowing, that as ye are partakers of the sufferings, so shall ye be also of the consolation!"
Well, heck.... makes sense to me!
How eerie!
I doubt the GOP has any kind of cajones to implement the final paragraph.
Interesting piece, Z. And nerve wrecking, too. It aptly brought to print my gravest fears - beginning with attacks on our soil and dirty bombs. The first responsiblity of the Commander in Chief is to protect the homeland and us. Too bad the Dems don't get it, or the very real threats out there. They just call it fearmongering.
"fearmongering"...yes, Karen..and "eerie"...big time, Brooke.
WHEN WILL WE WAKE UP?
Did you hear Obama's announcing he won't be making his acceptance speech at the DNC convention; he's going into a STADIUM for 75,000 people to let ALL of his people FEEL THE HOPE, THE CHANGE, THE LOVE.
The puke.
The economy needs a tax cut?
Didn't Chucklenuts Bush get us into this partially through tax cuts.
Tax cuts and deregulation. Give the Wall Street crowd plenty of free chips for the tables. That's worked real well and the fool Republicans are going to play pitch till you win.
I recommend inflation indexed bonds.
LOL, Z, sorry about the post removals up top...I am stuttering today.
Your post has had an effect on me. Wonderful read.
Even so, the McCain/Rice ticket would have won the election if it weren't for the fact that 16 percent of conservative Republicans voted for... anyone remember? That's right, Bob Barr (Z: or Chuck Baldwin), another name that's a footnote in history.
You really should get off the "vote for McCain he's our only chance" bandwagon, Z. Voting for McCain will NOT help to reform the Republican Party.
A great read indeed; all entirely possible, but voting for Baldwin has absolutely nothing to do with giving Obama any chances whatsoever for the presidency.
Not slamming you, Z, because sadly, there are a lot of sheeple who are set in this mindset where they actually believe that voting for someone other than McCain is going to give Obama a chance.
My vote is going to Baldwin. Period. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
Further, if I really wanted change and reform in the Republican Party, I'd be voting for Obama, because apparently that would be the ONLY way to send that strong message.
But go ahead and vote for McCain though. He "promises" to reverse the budget problems in four years. What a courageous liar he is. In four years, we'll be like Mexico - in poverty and debt, and no tomatoes since our bodies will be unable to adapt to E coli.
American Airlines going out of business. Wow. That may happen before year's end. Who wrote this? Fantastic read!
On this matter of Iran nuking Israel. Never mind the fact that Israel is a nuclear state, I don't understand how Iran expects to get away with killing fellow Muslims and possibly destroying the third holiest site in Islam.
I think the article is short on logic and high on emotion. In other words, it's right wing.
Steve, "What a courageous liar he is. In four years, we'll be like Mexico - in poverty and debt, and no tomatoes since our bodies will be unable to adapt to E coli."
Now one thing we can agree on across the entire political spectrum is that one of the things that makes life worth living is home grown tomatoes. Their easy and you need a few vines.
Ducky, the economy has always done better with tax cuts. period.
As for Iran bombing Israel, that's Iran's big promise, not the writer of the excellent piece.
STEVE...get this straight, buddy, and I don't mean to 'slam' you, either.
Obama will kill this country as you and I know and would like it......
NOTHING I EVER do is going to even remotely help him do that.....nothing.
I don't care as much about teaching Republicans a lesson as I do saving this country's integrity.
Duck, but of course, I was being faecetious. I wished others could detect it, but....tomatoes are a good thing indeed. Lessons learned: I lost half of my crop. Next year I am using two fenceposts and one big piece of horse fence as the stakes....the bamboo stakes were just too fragile and my plants reached an incredible 6 feet in height (the better boys did anyway) but the others are still around 4 feet and growing strong.
Z, we simply have to do what we think is right, even if our opinion differs. But seriously, no offense taken by any means and I consider you a blogging friend.
Regardless who gets elected (I know it won't be Baldwin) but he's getting my vote anyway because I believe in the Constitution Party. I just don't believe in Obama or McCain, as painful as it sounds.
Both Obama and McCain are proving that the American public, in general, know absolutely nothing about our political system because both are making promises and gestures as if they are here to save the day when they simply cannot do it.
However, your post here is proving to be a worthy (and very memorable) read indeed.
If you posted the Baldwin comment in to get my goad, congratulations!
Steve, of course we're buddies! And of COURSE I threw in BALDWIN for you!
And, of course, I still think you're wrong.
I agree with much of what you say, but my math is different. Not voting for McCain is a vote for Obama.
And, again.......you can't CHANGE IT this year! You know that. Get Mr. Baldwin all set for 2012 and some of us will take a real good, hard look at him!
And of COURSE I threw in BALDWIN for you!
She said, with diabolical laughter, rubbing hands together in delight...
But seriously (and unfortunately) the only way to get Baldwin recognized is to vote for him now.
My convictions are firm in the belief that I cannot find myself voting for McCain. I would just find myself backing the biggest fear of all time - knowing that I'm voting in a guy who wants to give illegal immigrants amnesty, which will just entice more of them to come in over the border.
...and of course I'd be lying if I told you that if Obama does get elected, I will poop my pants....so don't believe a word of that!
steve...that sentence is so full of double negatives, I'm confused.
You WON"T "poop your pants" if Obama's elected...because you feel we deserve it ? Or that that will finally wake Republicans UP?
Remember the SCOTUS and LIFETIME appointees, Steve.......remember that even Chuck Baldwin would have to work with a largely Democrat congress in the Fall, and they'd stamp out EVERYTHING he tried against illegals, etc.
well, steve..I guess we'll be at fistacuffs until November, right?
And, if Obama does win, I'll have to personally come to the Valley and slap you up one side of the head and down the other..IF I were a violent girl, that is!!! :-)
Z,
You can come to the valley and slap me so hard, I'd write bad checks for you even.
My wording was atrocious. Again, trying to be funny, that's all, but I will poop my drawers if he gets elected - but that wouldn't be my fault, of course.
A lot of times, I tend to drift into being less serious than I should be.
But enough of this - your post on yellow cake has me intrigued b/c this is the first I've heard about it. Nice scoop in the blogosphere....
...and further, not fisticuffs at all.
Do you know how many people actually hate me since I declared my non-support toward McCain? Most of the people who come against me on this are the SAME EXACT PEOPLE who denigrate the idea of giving illegal immigrants a break, and to me, that is sickening on its own.
Incognito:
I'll drink to that. I am certain that others will actually agree with you here.
Steve! YOU will drink to what incognito said?
So now you ARE going to vote for McCain!? What did it take, Stevo!!?
Any vote that is not specifically cast FOR McCAIN will become a vote for OBAMA. you can take THAT it the bank.
If McCain is Peck's Bad Boy, Obama is BEELZEBUB.
If McCain is a Flying Monkey, OBAMA is the Wicked Witch of the West.
If McCain one of Cinderella's wicked stepsisters, Obama is her wicked STEPMOTHER.
If McCain gives you a case of Ptomaine, Obama will give you LEPROSY.
Etc. Etc. Etc.
Vote McCain or Vote in Vain!
~ FreeThinke
whoa! Jeez....I must've been sleeping! Chrissakes! I must rescind from my last post! EEEK! This is a sign that I need to refrain from blogging awhile!
Nah, Z... he obviously misread my statement ;-)
Sorry. I just refuse to jump on the McCain bandwagon. McCain is a liberal and wants to grant amnesty to illegals, and illegal immigration is a big concern of mine.
My convictions remain firm on Baldwin. My vote won't give Obama any chances either. You may claim your math says it will, but it doesn't do it in my books.
But the last thing I need is an argument on this right now, so...you're all going to have to just accept that Steve here isn't giving a vote to McCain. No way. Not. Ever.
Steve! That was spiritual guidance!! heee heee!! A moment of DIVINE INTERVENTION....absolutely true!! (smile)
and, tho you don't want to discuss it (which is fine with me)...can you or someone else tell me how one less vote for mcCain IS NOT a help for Obama? Steve...do it mathematically, I'm interested.
I just finsihed a post on the Math.. inspired by Steve...
Well, maybe you're on to something. Since I suck at math, I can't tell you - but I already feel this -- that our votes do not really matter. I think the candidate is already chosen. Not trying to be conspiracy theorist here, but I believe that there are higher powers that make decisions far above government.
All I really want to see is the media just one time mention the Constitution Party, but they won't.
A lot of us actually liked Ron Paul's ideas - but did you see how the media shunned him right off the bat and even refused him into debates after a while?
I'm going to try and make this simple for those of you who somehow foolishly believe that a vote for a 3rd party candidate or a no vote is NOT a vote for Obama.
My views aren't foolish. It's just the way that I feel about my convictions on McCain.
So let's not start off on the wrong foot.
Steve, If I said that (i can't find it!?), then I apologize. I'd never mean to call anyone FOOLISH for their beliefs or opinions.
I still don't agree, but I don't think you're a fool.
Z.. it was me in a post i just wrote. I do find it foolish to not vote for McCain. Plain and simple. And since when is calling something foolish a major insult? Had I called them idiots i would agree..that is imsulting, but I didn't. There are many definitions for foolish, including unwise.. and i do find it unwise to vote for a 3rd party candidate.
When we have so much at stake in this upcoming vote, i am going to say what I need to say.
Sorry if you found my post insulting. It wasn't intended to rankle you, by any means, but I still don't understand your logic. So sorry.
Peace.
I'd never mean to call anyone FOOLISH for their beliefs or opinions.
No problem whatsoever, Z. This is being discussed heavily via email with other bloggers.
Steve:
If you live in the absolute bluest state in the country, you have my blessing to vote Barr. If you live in ANY OTHER STATE, you're WRONG!
Want to send the party a message, get Washington D.C. to vote 100% NOBAMA. Who gives two shits about them and their electoral votes anyway.
Z:
Fantastic post!!!
Joe
Average American:
That is fine, but let's respect one another's opinions. I am not WRONG about anything when it comes to voting and have been doing it since I was 18.
You know what, Steve..sometimes I get the distinct feeling the election is in the bag, too.
In that case, and that case ONLY, your voting for Baldwin is understandable.
Yep. If you really think about it, maybe voting is a waste of time.
Frankly, I have become sickened with politics and the discussion thereof. Maybe it's just temporary. Right now I am seriously thinking about passwording the BIOS on a stubborn user's machine who thinks he knows what he's doing with his computer, but instead he's dicked it up good this time. I am now wiping his machine. Screw this.
Post a Comment