Wednesday, February 27, 2013

BZ nails it...........so's Bob Woodward

Our friend Bloviating Zeppelin NAILS IT.  Did you hear what liberal Bob Woodward said about OBAMA?  Click HERE!

UPDATE:  Woodward is saying he had an email today from a "senior WH official" telling him he'd "regret" going against Obama.  Quite a bunch, huh?  Threatening because someone has the guts to do what Woodward did? 




Z

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bob...is past his prime. There's only so much of a ride he can continue on Nixon's back...now that he's attempted to shine the lite on a dem....he's toast.

As a true journalist, ( In the Edward R. Murrow vein ) he's an anachronism to the new breed of toady "journalists". Since he's now decided to attack a dem ( which he's always been one of...which is why he crucified Nixon ) they'll turn on him and eat him alive.

Do not be surprised if some scurrilous emails or memos attacking him show up on the net somewhere.

And he's also told us he's been warned by an operative...a fascist operative of the new Hitler in Chief ( not sorry libs...you asshats used it on Bush ) to be "careful".

Bob has picked the right fight..and about time. But Bob...you're still an utter failure and slobberer of the Fascist Kenyan king.

You passed on F&F...you passed on Benghazi...you passed on the fiscal cliff...you passed on Hillary...you passed on sequestration...you passed on the Kenyans true identity...you passed on Newton...you passed on womens rights to defend themselves....

Let's face it Bob...you're a complete failure as a "journalist". And I Hope they destroy you...you fake.

Bob..you'll be lucky is you get a gig at Howard u...telling the thick skinned what you really meant about OJ.

Z said...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/28/usa-fiscal-woodward-idUSL1N0BS0VD20130228?feedType=RSS&feedName=cyclicalConsumerGoodsSector&rpc=43

Anonymous, Woodward's been on the wrong side of about every subject, you're right. But I believe he got it right on this, of course, because I agree with him.

you're not quite spot on with 'careful'...but you got the crux of it.
I was just coming to link that very thing and read your comment.

Woodward is saying that a senior WH official told him he will "regret" going against Obama.

THIS might be JUST what we've been hoping for; someone FINALLY with the strength to stand up to those thugs.

For FOUR YEARS, I've said "The only thing that will finally make people see the real Obama is a LIBERAL who FINALLY sees the truth and reveals it."

Could this be it? Ya, maybe, but the rest of the media'll annihilate Woodward in their defense of their messiah.

Could get interesting, SHOULD get interesting if America had a true media, but it'll probably just go away.........
who knows what they threatened Woodward with?

Ducky's here said...

The Black Messiah's a narcissist?

Color me shocked. Yawn.

Anonymous said...

"someone FINALLY with the strength to stand up to those thugs."

Sorry to disagree....but Bob will fold. They'll remind him of the Libyan ambassador's fate.

With Watergate he was never threatened...he had total cooperation from WAPO...do you think he'll get it again or now?

WAPO is just another extension of the Kenyan's PR team...frauds, fakes, liars and corrupt.

Under the bus? Hell no...Bob will get run over by the Kenyan's limo on K Street or poisoned at a Georgetown bistro...they'll say he had a heart attack. He is 69 and a potential candidate.

Don't be naive...the Kenyan is from Chicago...and committed to Rahm, Ayers, Dohrn, Wright, Frank Davis and every extreme fascist thug bastard element taught to him from the 60's radicals.
Including his Marxist cow mother then by her parents...committed to his Marxist conversion and upbringing. They did it all for "Stanley".

None of them should be allowed to breath the air of a free Republic.

Ducky's here said...

"None of them should be allowed to breath the air of a free Republic."

-----
I love it when the Nazis start yacking about "freedom".

Always On Watch said...

This topic is now on the front page of several mainstream media web sites. Not sure that it will matter, though. The Cult of Obama is very, very strong.

Z said...

Ducky, what gave you reason to call my guest a NAZI?
You, with your history of despising anything Israel is calling someone else a NAZI?

is anybody who disagrees with you now a NAZI?

he's right on all he said except that I'm naive. I said very clearly above that this Woodward information will fade away. he'll be threatened like Gloria Allred was when she screamed FRAUD during the Obama/Hillary primaries and suddenly shut up FAST, and other times where a lib's come out critical of Obama and then fades away so quickly...

AOW..it won't last. Nothing lasts. That's why I think the WH threatens.
Well, they DID say Woodward would "regret" it...sounds like the mafia to me.

Shaw Kenawe said...

Z wrote: "Woodward is saying he had an email today from a 'senior WH official' telling him he'd 'regret' going against Obama."

That entire statement is a lie.

I never expect blogs like this one to seek out the facts in any particular story, because of its ODS, but a child would have been able to dig out the facts in this one--a curious child that is.

Here are the facts [they aren't what your fantasies require, but they are the facts.]

From Gene Sperling, consultant to the White House:

"Bob: I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest.

But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim.


Woodward's response:

"Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice. I am listening. I know you lived all this. My partial advantage is that I talked extensively with all involved. I am traveling and will try to reach you after 3 pm today. Best, Bob"

Anyone with half a brain understands that this friendly exchange between two friends--read Woodward's reply again. There is no outrage whatsoever in any way, shape or form from a "threat."

Woodward is a snake in the grass for reporting this exchange between friends as a "threat." And you are dishonest to encourage other people to believe it.

But that's how you guys operate.

Always On Watch said...

What's THIS?

Excerpt:

Bob Woodward isn't the only person who's received threats for airing the Obama administration's dirty laundry. It seems anyone is a potential target of the White House these days - even former senior members of the Clinton administration.

A day after Woodward's claim that a senior White House official had told him he would "regret" writing a column criticizing President Obama's stance on the sequester, Lanny Davis, a longtime close advisor to President Bill Clinton, told WMAL's Mornings on the Mall Thursday he had received similar threats for newspaper columns he had written about Obama in the Washington Times.

Davis told WMAL that his editor, John Solomon, "received a phone call from a senior Obama White House official who didn't like some of my columns, even though I'm a supporter of Obama. I couldn't imagine why this call was made." Davis says the Obama aide told Solomon, "that if he continued to run my columns, he would lose, or his reporters would lose their White House credentials."...

Liberalmann said...

BZ is a moron.

White House reveals ‘threat’ Bob Woodward claims he received from staffer wasn’t a threat at all.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/28/alleged-white-house-threat-to-woodward-not-exactly-a-threat/

Liberalmann said...

Conservatives Regret Taking Woodward’s ‘Threat’ Story Seriously

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/conservatives-regret-taking-woodwards-threat-story-seriously?ref=fpb

Shaw Kenawe said...

Saying you don't like a column is NOT a threat. It is an opinion.

Kid said...

I wish it would have been something of importance though. 85 billion of spending? The fed is printing up 85 billion a month for QE3.

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwn. Not to You Z, to woodward. I give him the same yawn for watergate. Boring and unimportant.

Anonymous said...

Her hee I guess that Shaw (ass pain) don't get it!

Anonymous said...

"You Guys"?

Are you FREAKEN kidding? Go home your cage has been cleaned out of lice!

Anonymous said...

The only MORONS around here are YOU and Shaw......

FreeThinke said...

I've written this article -- or segments thereof --myself, not once, not twice but hundreds of times over the past twenty years. And haven't we all?

What we believe in our hearts to be the truth is NOT going to help us anymore -- if it ever did.

Why?

Because "they" refuse to believe it, and have a "truth" of "their" own, which they've done a better job of "selling," than we have ours.

As Uncle Rush so wisely, and so brashly said, "No one can beat Santa Claus."


He should have preceded that observation with "In a land where PERPETUAL CHILDHOOD is assured by a corrupt educational system and a perverse popular culture ..."

Meanwhile, "we" are killing ourselves by giving way to PERPETUAL RAGE. I'm certain that is exactly what "they" have hoped "we" would do all along.

It's nowhere near enough to "RIGHT." We must ALSO be SMART. Sorry, but they is and "we" ain't.

Always On Watch said...

FT,
Yes, many of us have been issuing warnings for years.

We are Cassandras.

Yesterday, I had a heated argument about sequestration with a client.
She considers herself a conservative.

Yet, this woman has swallowed the Obama administration's propaganda about how all sorts of suffering will ensue if we have sequestration. Not the least of that suffering being what will happen to her husband, a federal worker.

God forbid that her father's Medicaid be cut. She won't take him in, of course. That would interfere with her family's life.

Whine, whine, whine.

This woman claims to believe in small government. But God forbid that her son's subsidized speech therapy be cut -- never mind that he's been getting "free" therapy for over 10 years -- WITH LITTLE RESULT.

Apparently, many Americans do not want any cuts or sacrifice to have any personal effect.

The entitlement mentality is everywhere -- and not only on the Left. People do not understand that the government doesn't have any money other than the money extracted from the taxpayers' pockets.

People have been, in one way or another, sucking on the government teat for decades. And they don't even realize that they are doing so!

The federal government's tentacles extend into everything: education, subsidizing the building of fire department buildings (here in the D.C. area), and on and on.

People refuse to recognize economic realities. They are incapable of peering into the future far enough to see that their children will become adults that are serfs.

Bloviating Zeppelin said...

Z: thank you kindly for the Linkulus.

Anonymous: you know the axiom about the clock. This applies to Woodward. And I give props when applicable and deserved.

Ducky, indifferent once again with regard to Obaka. But at least you fall into the clock axiom. Because in this instance you're quite correct. Obama = NPD.

Bush was excoriated as being incurious. Apply that word to the entire DEM/MSM/AAA now. Massively written large.

Shaw Kenawe said... "but that's how you guys operate."

Right. Because how you feel isn't important. Tell that to the female who submits to intercourse because she only "feels" she has no other choice. Because, after all, feelings aren't important and it's NEVER about "feelings" but only about the literal message. As someone so immature and callow, you should know there's an entire industry around "feelings" in the private and corporate world, and it's called "sexual harassment." Because it actually exists in the real world.

Thanks LiberalMANN, you teutonic ηλίθιος.

You make me smile with your ignorance.

BZ

Anonymous said...

Maturity????

You believe in a mythical sky "God" that is angry, malevolent, vindictive, kind, giving, wrathful etc.

When you vote for someone because of "faith," you are truly delusional.

Not to mention a Mormon!?? I could understand a Catholic or Protestant, but Mormonism is closer to Scientology than it is to Christianity. It's a false religion founded by a convicted fraud and acnotorious philanderer, pedophile, bigamist and murderer. The fact that anyone even takes Mormons seriously is a glaring stain on America's conscious.