Sunday, March 15, 2009

"Journalistic DUTIES..?"

From AP, and a Headline on the Yahoo Homepage:

"Stewart has charged that people at CNBC knew what was going on behind the scenes on Wall Street but didn't tell the public. He has accused CNBC anchors and pundits of abandoning their journalistic duties and acting like cheerleaders for the market."

The irony! He's kidding, right? Here's my response:

"Conservatives have charged that the media in this country knew and recognized the problems associated with the people in Obama's background and his Socialist goals for America but didn't tell the public. We have accused every major network, most cable news networks, and 90% of every newspapers of abandoning their journalistic duties and acting like cheerleaders for the liberal Democrats."

Works for ME! But, it's okay for the LEFT to accuse...........not us.

As for the Cramer/Stewart dust-up; the clear message is "You'd BETTER not question this administration in ANY way, or your whole place of business will be roundly and openly criticized!" YOWEEEE, this is scary.

z

29 comments:

christian soldier said...

All is not lost!--We must support honorable people --and - my Sunday 'faith' post has links to a possible run for Pres. by a 'lead from the FRONT' paragon of vision and honor-Gen. David Petraeus !!

Anonymous said...

I would add that the media in this country conspired to elect a man president who was not qualified, either through experience, integrity, or leadership ability, and that having done so, they no longer deserve the special trust and confidence of the American people as a “free and independent press.”

Anonymous said...

Well Jon Stewart, you're a real laugh riot huh?

I thought he was a comedian! Kramer seems like a jerk too, to be honest, but why didn't he ask Stewart how he likes being a shill for the President? Just another in a long line of shills.

Kramer sat there like a naughty child with a weak, "I didn't mean to" attitude like a five year old.

Why anyone of the opposite opinion would go on that show is beyond me. He/she would have to be a masochist.

Pris

da patriot said...

Until the left figures out exactly how they are going to crush freespeech, they have to rely upon their usual tactics of intimidation. Intimidation has worked pretty well; and when it doesn't, during a Democrat administration, you will have various government agencies breathing down your neck.

Brooke said...

Two jerkwads taking the gloves off, IMO.

But you're right, Z. The hypocrisy is astounding.

Anonymous said...

I quit listening to the MSM for my facts a long time ago.

LA Sunset said...

In my view, there are very few true journalists left, specifically on TV.

Many are commentators, but few are journalists. John Stossel is one of the few journalists left.

Chuck said...

There has been a change in the MSM, IMHO. It seems they have gone from covering for and cheering on the left to demonizing the right. It seems to be coordinated with the Obama WH attack on people who don't agree with them (Rush, Cramer, etc). I don't think it's coordinated officially but I also don't think it's a coincidence.

Anonymous said...

Chuck, whether official or otherwise, it is hard to imagine that someone isn't orchestrating the attacks, especially since Ram Emanuel holds morning teleconference calls with the MSM insiders.

Either way, it does not reflect an impartial press. If only people would generate a letter writing campaign to the sponsors of the televised news media telling them that they won't be purchasing anymore viagra ... that would get their attention.

Z said...

Mustang, you ARE SO FUNNY!>>>if it weren't SO darned true, it would be even more laugh-worthy! Ya, "No more Viagara" and maybe they'd listen!

Chuck, I DO think it's a huge push to demonize. Here is the equation I believe's been in order for a while now:

Democrats....right!

Republicans... EVIL. Not 'wrong', not 'disagreeable', not misled...EVIL.

And, I keep saying that in a million different ways: UNTIL WE FIX THAT WE WILL NOT WIN ANOTHER ELECTION, FOLKS. imo, that is.

LA Sunsett: Stossel wouldn't even COMMENT on something the other night on TV because he hadn't reported on the subject, wasn't up on it. THAT's integrity.

Anonymous said...

I don't think I can remember ever trusting the media. Although, the liberal political influence has gotten worse. We don't have a free and unfettered press, although our government doesn't control it. The Democratic Party sure does though.

Sal's Gal

Anonymous said...

You're right, Steve. We have not seen the last of Acorn. Sadly.

Kris said...

good point about criticism. also the fact that the media has totally old America a bill of goods called obama. i happen to watch cramer and he was not fairly handled by this guy, but why should we be surprised?

kw

Anonymous said...

Steve H, ACORN just got another couple of billion federal dollars in the Porkulus bill, I think. Lord knows how many fraudulent votes can be attributed to ACORN's antics. Very sad to see our money going to support a group of liars, cheaters and scammers.

Sal's Gal

Z said...

Doesn't ACORN get some huge amount in the STIMULUS package? I thought it was $40 million to "community service groups" (a la Alinsky, of course)

Who's following up on all those cases where people thought ACORN had REALLY overstepped their bounds and intimidated voters, etc.? Instead, the Left turns it around and accuses the Right.
A la Saul Alinsky, again, of course.

Anybody who believes ACORN is only out there to fix it for the Left also believes that ROCK THE VOTE wants the 3 Republicans under 25 to vote, too.

Anonymous said...

FactCheck.org has a piece about $5.2 Billion dollars going to several organizations competing for it, ACORN included.

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_the_stimulus_bill_include_a_52.html

Sal's Gal

Z said...

Sal's Gal..thanks, and thanks for coming by.

Did you see the bias in "FactCheck?" Same as Wikipedia, and especially Snopes..it's laughable, isn't it!?

Yes, ACORN is eligible for a part of that funding.

My biggest fear was when Obama told ACORN they'd be invited to the WH before he took office to make sure he represented them. THAT is frightening.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDZiMjkwMDczZWI5ODdjOWYxZTIzZGIyNzEyMjE0ODI=

Anonymous said...

The only DUTY journalists have today is to produce as much DOO DOO as possible.


The public has been infected with a disease that gives it an insatiable appetite for DOO DOO.


In Art there was DA-DA-ism --- a pronounced move toward irrationality and infantilism.


In journalism we have had DOO-DOO-ism for a very long time.


I suggest the nation be diapered en masse until this dread disease may be eradicated lest we be buried nostril deep in DOO DOO.


We are perilously close as it is.


~ FreeThinke

Anonymous said...

I didn't know FactCheck.org was liberally biased. Thank you for the heads up. Should've paid more attention to the piece I pasted.

Since Annenberg sponsored the site, I thought it would be safe. But Obama was involved in an Annenberg trust in Chicago, right?

Sal's Gal

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Z said...

Sal, no problem. Who'd know that so many of these groups are dedicated to bias?

FT...we've got to get the facts and hope people will stand together somehow...somewhere.

Anonymous said...

Around 565 BC, the Athenian tyrant, Peisistratus, introduced the Dionysian Competition into Athenian culture. The original competition consisted of authors submitting a tragedy and a burlesque like satyr play. The purpose Peisistratus envisioned for these tragedy competitions was to both unify the Athenian masses with a common culture and exhort them to "virtue". In subsequent years, a "comedy" competition was added to the competition which replaced the satyr play. It's purpose was to "ridicule the base" and to extinguish intemperate behaviors (like sodomy) which the "judges" found offensive.

John Stewart is a comedian. His role is not "journalistic" in any way, shape or form. His job is NOT to report the facts/news, it's to add "colour" by passing moral judgement on the events and find humour in and "ridicule" those values (like making money) that he finds "base".

Comedy has always been the cultural weapon used to "destroy" moral values and behaviors society finds "unsuitable" and which need to be be targetted for elimination. What I'd like to know is, when did the "greed" associated with making money become unsuitable to a capitalist society?

After all, as Hesiod so aptly stated in one of the first works ever preserved by Western Civilization...

Muses of Pieria who give glory through song, come hither, tell of Zeus your father and chant his praise. Through him mortal men are famed or un-famed, sung or unsung alike, as great Zeus wills. For easily he makes strong, and easily he brings the strong man low; easily he humbles the proud and raises the obscure, and easily he straightens the crooked and blasts the proud, -- Zeus who thunders aloft and has his dwelling most high.
Attend thou with eye and ear, and make judgements straight with righteousness. And I, Perses, would tell of true things.

So, after all, there was not one kind of Strife alone, but all over the earth there are two. As for the one, a man would praise her when he came to understand her; but the other is blameworthy: and they are wholly different in nature. For one fosters evil war and battle, being cruel: her no man loves; but perforce, through the will of the deathless gods, men pay harsh Strife her honour due. But the other is the elder daughter of dark Night, and the son of Cronos who sits above and dwells in the aether, set her in the roots of the earth: and she is far kinder to men. She stirs up even the shiftless to toil; for a man grows eager to work when he considers his neighbour, a rich man who hastens to plough and plant and put his house in good order; and neighbour vies with is neighbour as he hurries after wealth. This Strife is wholesome for men. And potter is angry with potter, and craftsman with craftsman, and beggar is jealous of beggar, and minstrel of minstrel.

Perses, lay up these things in your heart, and do not let that Strife who delights in mischief hold your heart back from work, while you peep and peer and listen to the wrangles of the court-house. Little concern has he with quarrels and courts who has not a year's victuals laid up betimes, even that which the earth bears, Demeter's grain. When you have got plenty of that, you can raise disputes and strive to get another's goods. But you shall have no second chance to deal so again: nay, let us settle our dispute here with true judgement which is of Zeus and is perfect. For we had already divided our inheritance, but you seized the greater share and carried it off, greatly swelling the glory of our bribe-swallowing lords who love to judge such a cause as this. Fools! They know not how much more the half is than the whole, nor what great advantage there is in mallow and asphodel.

Anonymous said...

Google, Yahoo, Snopes, FactCheck, Wikipedia, et al. are ALL run by liberals.


What ISN'T?


Even the Republican PARTY is run by liberals --- BOTH the Bushes were de facto liberals. Their actions and the disastrous consequences they've had give proof enough of that. They squandered Ronald Reagan's beautiful legacy.


The same must be said about the so-called Republican Majority that supposedly had unified power for twelve years and did NOTHING with it --- NOTHING.


The agenda of opposing parties should be to ANNIHILATE each other's political agenda. Instead they COOPERATE entirely too much. The activities of Congress are tantamount to a active conspiracy against the best interests of American citizens.


We've been had by a bunch of One Worlders.


~ FreeThinke

Z said...

But, FJ, we have a country which confuses entertainment for real news and enjoys watching someone whoop someone else...and OH, it's so funny to be glib and make tons of money bringing people down, dontchaknow.
And "bribe swallowing lords" rule today..sadly.

FT...I think you're right. I think the Republicans squandered their chance BUT I think it was because what's being discussed a little bit now is that Bush had to sign a lot of big gov't spending to protect IRaq appropriations. I always believed he was bribed by the Dems "Either you sign or we won't back Iraq". I finally heard someone admit this the other day on the radio..gave quite a story, but I think we won't know the rest of it, maybe ever.

Ducky's here said...

As for the Cramer/Stewart dust-up; the clear message is "You'd BETTER not question this administration in ANY way, or your whole place of business will be roundly and openly criticized!"

----------------------

Huh? Stewart is asking why Cramer was on TV constantly touting the crooks during the Bush administration.

The broadcast media was completely derelict and the print media wasn't much better. Business Week, occasionally The Economist,Alan Abelson at Barron's,Floyd Norris at the NYT ... these folks were trying to blow the whistle but everyone else was "bon temps roulez".

It was so obvious that capital was out chasing investment which is a recipe for a bubble rather than ideas looking for capital which is a means of growth.
I don't believe the right even understands the basics of the economic system the champion.

Pat Jenkins said...

for a comedian (john stewart) who has done nothing but mock others for his laughs, to sit in some sort of purity, is despicable. he, mr. stewart, is NOTHING but a mere COWARD!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Time for a PRIMAL SCREAM:


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!


AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!


Your rational posts, good friends, are true and honest enough, but we cannot combat the WILLFUL IRRATIONALITY and determinedly destructive agenda of the left with REASON.


Why not?


Because Marxian Dialectics and the tactics of Lenin, Trotsky, The Frankfurt School, Gramsci, Kun, Emma Goldman, Samuel Gompers, Saul Alinsky, the ACLU --- a damnable organization founded specifically to protect the Civil Rights of COMMUNISTS! --- and liberal judges along with the Professoriat --- all of whom USE the Law and the Constitution to UNDERMINE the Rule of Law, circumvent the Constitution, spit in the face of Order, and thereby destroy our God-given rights and liberties --- ALL of THAT was and remains dedicated to the ANNIHILATION of Common Sense, Common Decency, Respect for Authority, Love of Country, self-respect, INDIVIDUAL PROSPERITY, and above all BELIEF in GOD.


They want to CONTROL you. They want to DICTATE to you. They want to see the END of America as we have known it --- and just as Marx said, they want to establish WORLD GOVERNMENT over which "THEY" will reign supreme for ever and ever.


They will KILL anything and anyone who gets in their way.


Sooner of later we will HAVE to realize that the only way to deal the "them" is to DESTROY them in any and every way imaginable. Millions upon millions will have to die horrible deaths. We may have to enter a new Dark Age and go through the whole dreary cycle again.


"The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed [periodically] with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure."


~ Thomas Jefferson


Also, I would remind everyone that FACTS are NOT the equivalent of TRUTH. Facts are only tiny pieces of a huge mosaic and only God understands exactly what the picture represents.


The Left --- and also the Theocrats --- represent TYRANNY. Christ Jesus said, "Ye Shall Know the Truth and the Truth Shall Make You free."


Notice please that he didn't say it would make us "safe," "happy," and "secure." He said FREE.


There is a HUGE spiritual and philosophical difference between "safety" and "freedom"


Franklin said, "He who would give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety."


And Shakespeare said (in Macbeth) "Security is mortals' chiefest enemy."


I think it should be fairly obvious that all this boils down to: EXTREMISM in DEFENSE of LIBERTY is NO VICE."


Don't wring your hands. Don't bite your lip. Don't fret. Don't weep. Instead, "gird up your loins," and preare to do battle.


It really is better to be killed fighting for Truth and Freedom than it is to die a miserable slave to those who would, humiliate and impoverish you "for your own good."


~ FreeThinke

Anonymous said...

Yoda: Premonitions, premonitions. These visions you have...

Anakin Skywalker: They are of pain, suffering. Death.

Yoda: Yourself you speak of, or someone you know?

Anakin Skywalker: Someone.

Yoda: Close to you?

Anakin Skywalker: Yes.

Yoda: Careful you must be when sensing the future Anakin. The fear of loss is a path to the dark side.

Anakin Skywalker: I won't let these visions come true, Master Yoda.

Yoda: Death is a natural part of life. Rejoice for those around you who transform into the Force. Mourn them do not. Miss them do not. Attachment leads to jealousy. The shadow of greed that is.

Anakin Skywalker: What must I do, Master Yoda?

Yoda: Train yourself to let go... of everything you fear to lose.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Farmer John for that last bit of dialogue. I take it as support of what I said and quoted just above.


The bible puts it very simply:


"If you would have your life, you must be willing to lose it.


Living in fear is Living Death.


~ FreeThinke