Here's my thinking: We set caps on players' income. They can hassle with lawyers and contracts over whether they get 1 million or 10 million a year (which I think is still too much, but...) and then that's it. But, then the owners would get all that extra money, you ask? NO. They have caps, too. After that, the money goes to CHARITY. Let them hassle about which charity instead of how they can all have a piece of the NINE BILLION DOLLARS at stake in my linked article. Yes, I'm a free market Conservative and think we all should financially do as well as we can but when you hear numbers like those in the article, one begins to think.........Earn all you want! But..........maybe divide it up with those much less fortunate?