Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Why even mention Obama?

THIS is the kind of media thing I can't stand.
A friend of Obama is arrested for soliciting a prostitute and they need to make it about OBAMA?  What does HE have to do with this?
This is dishonest, not right, and just plain stupid ........well, I guess that describes most of our mainstream media today, come to think of it.


beamish said...

It's guilt by association. If he wasn't a friend of Obama's, he probably wouldn't have to pay for sex.

Pris said...

With all the things they could report on about Obama, this is the best they can do?

It's meaningless in terms of this President.

They could fill an entire newspaper with the corruption and incompetence in this administration, but no, they pick something totally unrelated in any way. How ridiculous!

Thersites said...

This is probably the work of jealous Obama insiders looking to make their boss keep away from a "bad influence" (read- someone they don't control).

Anonymous said...

So why did we get all worked up when wright, ayers, dohrn, van jones et al and all his other questionable associations came to light?


Because it tells lots about the man.

Joe said...

Like a porn movie, President BO has no socially redeeming value.

Always On Watch said...


If he wasn't a friend of Obama's, he probably wouldn't have to pay for sex.

Comment of the day! LOL.

Ticker said...

Birds of a feather.... pretty much sums it up.

Anonymous said...

"A man is known by the company her keeps."

"If you lie down with dogs, you'll get up with fleas."

There's nothing wrong with attributing guilt by association. In truth it's the acid test.

~ Persona non Grata

Ducky's here said...
This comment has been removed by the author.