One day at the courthouse -- San Francisco.
'Next'
'Next'
'Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license.'
'Names?'
'Tim and Jim Jones.'
'Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance.'
'Yes, we're brothers.'
'Brothers? You can't get married.'
'Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?'
'Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!'
'Incest?' No, we are not gay.'
'Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?'
'For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don't have any other prospects.'
'But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've been denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman.'
'Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim.'
'And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?'
'All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next.'
'Hi. We are here to get married.'
'Names?'
'John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson.'
'Who wants to marry whom?'
'We all want to marry each other.'
'But there are four of you!'
'That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship.'
'But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples.'
'So you're discriminating against bisexuals!'
'No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples.'
'Since when are you standing on tradition?'
'Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere.'
'Who says? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!'
'All right, all right. Next.'
'Hello, I'd like a marriage license.'
'In what names?'
'David Deets.'
'And the other man?'
'That's all. I want to marry myself.'
'Marry yourself? What do you mean?'
'Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return.'
'That does it! I quit!! You people are making a mockery of marriage!!'
'Names?'
'Tim and Jim Jones.'
'Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance.'
'Yes, we're brothers.'
'Brothers? You can't get married.'
'Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?'
'Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!'
'Incest?' No, we are not gay.'
'Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?'
'For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don't have any other prospects.'
'But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've been denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman.'
'Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim.'
'And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?'
'All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next.'
'Hi. We are here to get married.'
'Names?'
'John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson.'
'Who wants to marry whom?'
'We all want to marry each other.'
'But there are four of you!'
'That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship.'
'But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples.'
'So you're discriminating against bisexuals!'
'No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples.'
'Since when are you standing on tradition?'
'Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere.'
'Who says? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!'
'All right, all right. Next.'
'Hello, I'd like a marriage license.'
'In what names?'
'David Deets.'
'And the other man?'
'That's all. I want to marry myself.'
'Marry yourself? What do you mean?'
'Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return.'
'That does it! I quit!! You people are making a mockery of marriage!!'
z: pass the aspirin!
35 comments:
It isn't far off, Z!
To hell with the People who've said no time and again...
Funny stuff, Zee . . . there is no end in sight; consider the human who loves his pet, or the craftsman who loves his tools. The possibilities are unlimited! Why, with such a liberal application to "marriage," even Pelosi could find a mate.
we'll see the most outlandish happenings coming out of this mess - wait until there's a mass exodus to divorce - can you imagine how happy this is making attornies everywhere?!?
wait'll one of them awakens one day and says, "i'm not gay anymore!" and goes for divorce only to find they have to pay alimony - BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
i say their embarking on just desserts - look at how heteros already say, "we had the perfect relationship until we got married..." or, "we didn't consummate our marriage in the "usual" manner - can we just get an annulment?"
oh, what a wicked web we weave.
"they're" not "their" in the second to last paragraph...
'For the financial benefits, of course....'
For the health insurance!
Hey Z...very funny indeed. I don't understand why people who are traditionalists are bigots. Why can't we camouflage our opinions like the left does. They call it "gay equality" and so I will call it "traditional equality" makes sense to me...great post! :)N
Kids? What do kids have to do with anything?
nanc....in California, the gays who got married during the last round of 'legality' are having a heck of a time divorcing from what I heard recently....and they filed for divorce very soon after their marriages...
This is about AGENDA, the amount of committed couples who don't want to mess around outside their relationship is infinitesimal to hear the gay people I've known talk...AND, the gay people who do have solid relationships have gone to lawyers and pretty much have their situations covered. They live dignified lives and don't need to march in parades or wear fishnet stockings...
For the most part, this is about "in your face" agenda......cheapen everything God-fearing Americans hold near and dear.
FJ..kids? they just have to get along. and like it. and turn into stellar adults, too.
Hi, Nikki "traditional equality"..great line..who'd have ever thought you'd have to coin it!? (I'm STILL trying to get over Herb being gay....tell me Peaches knows better..PLEASE!?!! HA!!)
I heard that too Z, from someone in San Francisco who has a lot of gay friends, that they are ridiculing the idea that gays want to stay together in couples. The very few who do have made their own arrangements long ago, as you say, and the others don't want the hassle of divorce either.
Don't forget the animal lovers!!! I mean, all's fair in love and lunacy, right?
What about Hindu children who want to marry a animal from an endangered species for the federal protection of their habitat?
yes there was the woman who married the dolphin
Hi All,
What the courts have done is not re-define marriage, they have un-defined it.
Diluted it to be meaningless. It just puts more cracks into the social order, which by all accounts is already pretty confused if you ask me.
The article is funny, but there's so much there to dread, that my laughter turned to a huge sigh, and a shaking of my head.
I feel we are so impotent to stop the madness, or even to slow it down.
It's like watching a bad movie, and not able to get our money back, or even able to leave. We are forced to watch as our country loses it's moorings.
Please, will someone wake me up now?
Pris
Pris, and we don't even get any popcorn. I feel like you do...worn waaaay down
PAPA! YOU were right...
ELBRO has a woman marrying a dolphin for us.... just GREAT, huh?
Beamish....Habitat? Carter isn't involved, IS he?
cj....thanks for the verification. very sad, I think, all of this.
dolphins are good with tobasco on them too....so if you decide you need a divorce....have some sushi instead...that way you can hide the evidence
that was nearly two years ago Z...they told us that stuff wouldn't happen....
Brilliantly put Z. That is the logical conclusion to allowing gay marriage, polygamy, incest, marrying animals, the whole shebang will follow. It has to.
Good stuff Z, but you forgot this option.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/3004930.stm
Brilliant z. I'm sitting here having a good laugh. We're spiraling off into the twilight zone.
aurora, we SURE are!
Puritan lad...thanks for coming by!
I might have missed that one, but "Beamish" above in his comment hadn't! And Elmer's Brother had a link to a woman marrying a DOLPHIN!
we are lost.....boy, are we lost!
All of this reminds me of an old folk song, albeit with a new twist.
If you remember him, imagine Burl Ives quietly singing this little ditty in light of today's absurdities.
FOLK SONG
There was an old woman who married a fly
I wonder why she married that fly
Perhaps she'll die?
There was an old woman who married a spider
Who wiggled, and jiggled, and squiggled inside her
She married the spider to catch the fly
I wonder why she married that fly
Perhaps she'll die?
There was an old woman who married a bat
Fancy that! She married a bat!
She married the bat to catch the spider
That wiggled, and jiggled, and squiggled inside her
She married the spider to catch the fly
I wonder why she married that fly
Perhaps she'll die?
There was an old woman who married a bird
How absurd to marry a bird
She married the bird to catch the bat
She married the bat to catch the spider
That wiggled, and jiggled, and squiggled inside her
She married the spider to catch the fly
I wonder why she married that fly
Perhaps she'll die?
There was an old woman who married a cow
I wonder how she married that cow
She married the cow to catch the bird
She married the bird to catch the bat
She married the bat to catch the spider
That wiggled, and jiggled, and squiggled inside her
She married the spider to catch the fly
I wonder why she married that fly
Perhaps she'll die?
There was an old woman who married a horse
She's dead, of course!
This silly old song immediately leapt into my mind after I'd read Z's very funny article. Thee son g brought laughter to me. I hope it provides a chuckle or two for you too.
~ FreeThinkexirxeibu
pretty darn close, eh, Z?
speaking of the unspeakable
ANGBRAD?
Phew!
I'd rather call them what they are -- The PITTS.
FT
with living together before, exhorbitant price of weddings, cheating during, and the divorce rate, weddings just aren't that sacred anymore - no matter who's in the wedding party
500 fires burning in California. Hm.
All their smoke is coming up here, East of the Sierra, can barely see hand in front of face.
Californians all come to retire up here too. They bring their politics.
I feel bad for the fires of course, but I wish their smoke would stay put. And their politics.
Z,
If I marry a snail darter, my [adopted?] children would theoretically get to live on a federally protected river bank.
CJ,
Good thing forest fires in California don't effect carbon emission and airborne particulate matter pollution readings in other states.
Er, wait...
I love it! Funny yet truthful, short, to the point, obvious....yep all indicators say it was great!
beamish, of course the wild fires don't affect other states....helloooooo state lines!!!!!
Good grief people! The lines divided the states therefore they simply must divide the pollution too.
EXACTLY, karma. YOU GOT IT!! The pollution stays ONLY over CHINA and INDIA, right?? Excellent point.
If we let people marry cows would they stop milking the government on the taxpayer's dime?
pops! great one..
If they married sheep, would they be on the LAMB anymore !
If they married pigs, would they SOW what they reap (ouch..sorry)
If they married BOB would they be on the DOLE?
oh, never mind. I'm getting desperate here. Yours was a good one!
Maybe we could let them marry lemmings and...well......you know!!!
Good grief...i wish it wasn't so true!! argh!
Post a Comment