Tuesday, October 7, 2008

BLOG BURST TUESDAY ... .Please email this to friends


Seriously Nobama08:

We cannot oppose Barack Obama without also opposing the party he represents, along with Republicans who enable socialist engineering. Barack Obama is not the only socialist who seeks elective office in November.

Why do we oppose Barack Obama? As comedian Jackie Mason recently reminded us, Barack Obama is popular because of the way he looks, the way he talks, and the way he presents himself – but remember that’s his field of expertise. His primary accomplishments include looking good, lying with a straight face, and associating himself with powerful radical activists. When you think about it, he is exactly who un-American liberals want living in the White House. Last week, we argued that Barack Obama is an empty suit. This week, we should admit the suit isn’t completely empty … there are dangerous, anti-American forces at work within the Obama election infrastructure.

It is difficult to fathom the arrogance of someone who, after only 143 days in the U. S. Senate, announces he is ready to assume the mantle of the presidency. And what is it exactly that causes this egotism? It may be that Barack Obama has cleverly orchestrated a sophisticated behind-the-scenes mechanism designed to create conditions favorable to his election. It is a cooperative of followers of (anarchist) Saul Alinsky, busily implementing the so-called “The Cloward-Piven Strategy of Orchestrated Crisis.” According to The Nation magazine (1966), “The ‘Cloward-Piven Strategy’ seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”

American Thinker illustrates the workings of this scheme in the following graph; one that demonstrates a well-funded program centered around George Soros’ Open Society Institute, managed by former SDS member Aryeh Neler, and facilitated by the now infamous Associations of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) (Note: Associations … plural). With 28 days to the National Elections, we do seem suddenly plagued with one financial catastrophe after another. Government bureaucracy is definitely overloaded, and society is being pushed into a sense of crisis. Fact, or fiction … the reader can decide for him or her self. But if it is only partially true, the implications present us with unsettling possibilities.



We are used to political organizations, such as the Democratic and Republican Party; but no one outside the radical left can be comfortable with an organization such as this. And if Barack Obama’s ego causes him to believe that he is brighter than most, and that he is ready to assume the mantle of the presidency … he could be correct – no one so far has been smart enough to figure out what is happening behind the scenes. Few mainstream journalists have seriously evaluated Obama’s connection to the anti-American, radical left; not the so-called conservative press, not the Republican Party, and none of the self-styled America-first organizations.

Barack Obama is dangerous for other reasons, too. On the one hand, it is possible to dismiss the junior senator as one of those people with advance degrees, lacking common sense. We can say that he is able to quote Marxist and anarchist rhetoric, but lacks a concomitant real world understanding of the implications of such radical ideas. But there is yet another possibility: Barack Obama knows exactly what he is doing. He knows precisely where he wants to take this country. And no one who understands this man’s motivations can feel comfortable with that perspective.

Barack Obama’s radicalism, thinly disguised by his subtle move to the political center-left, clearly repudiates everything America stands for. Conservative Americans may find themselves baffled by a man who professes love for the United States, but who then seeks to institute radical Marxist changes in government, in our courts, and within society … but not if we are watching and listening carefully to the Obama rhetoric. If we have not already dismissed common sense concern for his radicalism, if we have not already accepted Obama’s mild protestations of innocence, then we can recall the words of Jeremiah Wright on the pulpit (“g-damn America”) and we can say, “There is the real Barack Obama.” If we can focus on the obvious, we can draw a direct line between Jeremiah Wright’s church and the Black Racist ideology of the Nation of Islam and its leader, Louis Farrakhan – both of whom engage in the radicalization of the black community, then we know the real man behind the deceptively “empty suit.” The underlying, important question is, “Are Americans Paying Attention?”

By pursuing his radical, anti-American agenda, Barack Obama repudiates everything America stands for … and his rejection of our traditional values extends well beyond the sophomoric debate between capitalists and socialists, even if not altogether irrelevant. The United States is a great nation today because of our traditional values. Our forefathers rejected big government, and they were able to raise their families without having to rely on the mistaken notion that “Only a village can raise a child.” They avoided personal indebtedness, preferring to live within their means, and they denounced the idea that government is entitled to their hard-earned income. In the past, we celebrated entrepreneurial spirit; today we demean it. Today, encouraged by the poison of materialism and socialist entitlement programs, America is a nation of debtors; ever the opportunist, Barack Obama and his radical left organization is taking full advantage of our social and individual indolence.

Let us not forget that government largess feeds upon itself. Marxists use government to redistribute wealth; it is the great equalizer ensuring everyone is equally miserable. Obama is using Alinsky’s “community activism” to achieve that power, and socialist ideology to maintain it. We stand in opposition to Barack Obama and his machine politics because we reject Marxist/socialist government. It strips people of their individualism, their dignity, and their will to resist subjugation, but this is the goal of an Obama administration, gift wrapped with empty promises. In our view, Barack Obama is willing to do anything to achieve his objectives, legal or not. We categorically reject him as a new-age messiah, and we stand united against his anti-American programs and policies.

Our question to Obama supporters remains unanswered: “How is it possible to love America, and support Barack Obama?” The horror of radical left/Marxist ideology is Obama’s consistent and unfettered promise for America. It is why we oppose him. It is why we urge our readers to vote NO to Obama and NO to socialists in Congress.

Participants: Always on Watch; And Rightly So; Big Girl Pants; Chuck Thinks Right; Confessions of a Closet Republican; Farmer’s Letters; Fore Left; GeeeeeZ; Has Everyone Gone Nuts?; Learn Something Today; Long Range; Papa Frank; Mind of a Misfit; Paleocon Command Center; Political Yin and Yang; Pondering Penguin; Right Truth; Social Sense; The Amboy Times; The Bitten Word; The Crank Files; The Jungle Hut; The Logic Lifeline; The Merry Widow; TSOFAH;

21 comments:

Ducky's here said...

“The ‘Cloward-Piven Strategy’ seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”

----------------------
Actually, the strategy at the moment is to keep the deficit so high that progressive legislation is impossible. That's one reason the relatively centrist Clinton was unpopular with knuckle draggers like McCain.

Enjoy the Republican recession folks.

Ducky's here said...

Barack Obama is dangerous for other reasons, too. On the one hand, it is possible to dismiss the junior senator as one of those people with advance degrees, lacking common sense.
----------------------
Actually he has a great deal of common sense as opposed to a man who had his brains fried in Hanoi.

The presidency is no place to treat McCain's mental illness.

Anonymous said...

That's hilarious, mr. ducky. Blame Republicans for the hangover at the end of every Democratic "binge". And if a Republican or two should fall off the wagon in the process, it's because Republican ideals are at fault...

As for Obama having "common sense", I'm afraid I must agree. His senses are extremely "common". He's strictly "low-comedy".

Ducky's here said...

I certainly do, Farmer. There was a warning sent out about the quality of loans being issued. Alan "Mr. Bubble" Greenspan was asked to use his regulatory power and he refused.
Do you consider Greenspan a Democrat?

The House was asked to take action and Tom DeLay (R - Felon) said he didn't want to "interfere with the market".

Meanwhile my Republican brethren are embarrassing themselves by trying to blame the Community Investment Act for the difficulty.

This was a complete market failure. Anyone saying otherwise (i.e. John McCheese) is a danger to our republic.

defiant_infidel said...

A well done collaboration that is sure to raise the hair on the blind... as you have already witnessed. Your approach to this collective effort's goal is noble and humble. Thanks Mustang... all participants... and Z for hosting it. You're a class act.

Gayle said...

That's a great post, Z. I agree with it completely.

I don't think someone suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome as Ducky is, is in any shape mentally to be judging McCain on any front.

cube said...

Saw it at Chuck's. When I first read about Cloward-Piven Strategy on 9/28/08, it scared the heck out of me.

In my book, an affirmative action grad in radical anti-American studies doesn't exhibit a whole lot of common sense.

Anonymous said...

Alan "Mr. Bubble" Greenspan was asked to use his regulatory power and he refused.

Why should Alan interfere? HUD was the one directing Fannie/Freddie ro buy as many risky loans as the "community bankers" could make make and trying to qualify every wino in America for a 125% mortgage subsidized 1.5% rate... via the CRA and punishing banks that wouldn't go along. You're the danger to America, ducky. You cheer on the bailers whist ignoring the huge gaping hole that the water's coming in from.

Did you see Barney Frank blaming CDS regulators (himself) for the mess, yesterday? That's like blaming the insurance regulators for a firebomb that some arsonist threw in the building.

So stop trying to divert attention away from Mr. Frank and his arsonist regulators from ACORN. We know who they are.

Ducky's here said...

cube, he was editor of the Harvard Law Review. What are your credentials, you read Atlas Shrugged?

Please don't say yes because nobody has been able to finish that piece of junk.

Simply because you have no academic achievement is no reason to throw around the affirmative action label at your betters.

Anonymous said...

btw, ducky - What felony was Tom DeLay ever convicted of? Conspiracy to kick Democrats B*tts in every election? Why haven't any of the indictments come to trial? It's been over three years? Could it be that there was never anything there behind the charges to begin with? Could it be that it was just another Democratic partisan witch hunt all along?

Maybe if Democrats spent their time investigating and indicting real criminals instead of their political opponents for political incorrectness, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in.

Z said...

Ducky, please provide the articles Obama wrote, we'd love to see them. I believe there's one and I'm not sure that was published. I believe it was Khali Al Mansour who paid for his education with the stipulation he be the editor of the review; that bug you at all?

Also, remind us how any Harvard kid would ever be approached by any publisher and given a check to write memoirs, and a trip to the beach for months while he wrote. Thanks. Ever ask who was behind that little lie? And how Americans have BOUGHT it?!!!!!!

Actually, as you put it, the 'strategy at the moment' is to keep things so bad economically and misrepresent the past and present so badly (Pelosi and Hoyer)that people who're duped into thinking this is a Republican problem will run toward CHANGE (never asking how that's going to work).

The presidency is not needed to treat McCain because he has no mental disorder. I keep asking you to read Obama's books. When you have, you'll see that some of us are scared that this man's feelings toward his mixed race don't play a role in his presidency. Add the associations he DOES HAVE, the friends he's admired, and you've got real trouble. We could even have advisors like Raines!! Just what we need.

Please, don't worry. The lies you've bought into are also lies many Americans have bought into. I'm seeing that people HONESTLY don't question because they believe their media. Herein lies the biggest problem. NOne of us bloggers have the space to print every single thing we get in emails showing the problems of Obama....the media's surely not letting it out there (Except Hannity, who did an excellent exposee recently...but then you'd say HE'S CONSERVATIVE, HE CAN'T KNOW!. I know, Ducky, CNN did a hatchet job on the VERY fair and balanced job even before the opened, and that rep has stuck. never mind that CNN is the most biased of all channels. If you were open minded you'd see it for what it is. Not ONE conservative journalist. Pitiful)

Keep believing, Ducky..you're not alone; You'll win, I'm sure of it.

And then when we're less safe, have such spending that we'll NEVER recover from, when corporations are so highly taxed no company can keep employees working in this country, when Americans leave self-reliance for utter gov't dependence, when we're signing nuclear test bans only WE're banning because of, and more, you'll be feeling like all of us do about Obama: We're just further ahead on the learning curve.
How very sad.

Brooke said...

"Actually he has a great deal of common sense as opposed to a man who had his brains fried in Hanoi."

That's a really disgusting thing to say, Ducky. For shame!

Bloviating Zeppelin said...

Ducky: hey, if you're an advocate for Obama, why haven't you done YOUR patriotic duty and sent in MORE money to the US government willingly, rather than wait for the taxes to increase under Obama as, of course, they will. Remember, when cutting the larger check, smile BIG and make sure the KOOL AID logo is visible for the camera!

Good boy!

BZ

Anonymous said...

"[Obama]was editor of the Harvard Law Review. What are your credentials?"

Typical elitism from one of the animals who are sucking up to the pigs trying to seize control of the barnyard.

Of course, Ducky never answers any questions or provides a cogent point of view. As a case in point, observe his response to Cloward-Piven. It is what we expect from the duckster.

But there is a difference between Obama the Marxist and Ducky the Dolt. Obama knows exactly what he's up to ... the duck is clueless.

Ducky's here said...

bloviating, I hate to be crass but as soon as we have some far right "thinker" going on about taxes all we can think to do is ask them for their FreeRepublic screen name.

Here's the deal. I believe we should have a sound progressive tax policy. I paid over $80,000 last year. Probably more than you make.

And I paid primarily for a military that is essentially useless so I don't really want to up the ante.

Anonymous said...

Great Job on this blog team.
Well done.

Papa Frank said...

Ducky said: "Here's the deal. I believe we should have a sound progressive tax policy. I paid over $80,000 last year. Probably more than you make.

And I paid primarily for a military that is essentially useless so I don't really want to up the ante."

Nice view of our military who has given you the right to the free speech you abuse. Oh, and if you paid $80,000 in taxes last year then maybe you can buy your own blog instead of hiding behind nothing but the name ducky. Just a thought.

Z said...

Ducky, FreeRepublic is absolutely no more partisan than Moveon or KOS. I NEVER EVER read it, though I know some readers who do and put great store in it.
I find most of the headlines as misleading to the Right as the ridiculous Yahoo Homepage headlines lean to the left...astonishing. OFtentimes, one reads the Yahoo homepage headlines or the FR headlines and they're optimistically leaning in their side's favor but the article information doesn't quite support it. Of course, FreeRepublic is unabashedly and openly a conservative news venue, Yahoo masquerades as REAL NEWS!!!!! BIG difference between the honesty of both, don't you think? It's almost like FOX is demeaned for being TOO RIGHT and CNN is even more LEFT than they are but never gets the criticism!! When are you EVER going to realize that CNN is NO WORSE than FreeRepublic? NEVER EVER ONE journalist there is a Conservative. If you think that's good for democracy and getting real information out there, you're so sadly mistaken.

You come to this site and incorrectly out anyone you feel 'must be gay' as if gays are parriahs and then you support gay marriage, right?
What's with you and gayness? You a little confused?

The Obama folks want the rich to pay for the middle class; you think the Hollywood gazillionaires who are in love with him will be coughing up the money to save California's financial situation any time soon?

When you come here in the future, do your homework first, get a grip on what's fair and what's not(it'll be tough for you to give the left an unbiased look, but please try, you're just sounding so silly) and NEVER, EVER slam the American military. YOu'll be gone.

CJ said...

All I'm seeing on the MSM is denials that Obama's connection to Ayers was anything but casual and that, after all, his terrorism was forty years ago, and I'm not seeing any answers to it. Doesn't it have to be shown that he had more of a connection than that and that Ayers' terrorist anti-American philosophy never went away? Then of course they also trot out McCain's involvement with the Keating thing, even though McCain was exonerated. They're also saying that the motive for revealing Obama's past is only to sling mud because McCain is down in the polls, rather than what we've been needing to see -- some truth for a change. Well, we're finally seeing the taking off of the gloves, but it seems the left can lie and spin anything against the right.

CJ said...

Should have read FPM first I guess. They have an article on the same subject. How nice it would be if all this came out in the necessary detail.

http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=584AABBE-48F8-4C44-9F06-EAB63226E748

(((Thought Criminal))) said...

Ducky only paid $80,000 in taxes?

Hell, that's the excise on my cigarette habit.