Saturday, June 23, 2012

The LGBT Community.........illustrated

The 'class' of the LGBT community leaders that Obama must not have vetted before inviting them in for the big Gay Shindig, the first one at the White House is exhibited in these pictures.    Giving the finger to Reagan....the middle one is some 'man' giving the thumbs up to Bush.     One would think that the dignity they want so badly would have been better served if they respected the house which belongs to all Americans, but no...........
I believe many gays do not feel like this and this is just another bad representation of them, just as bad as gay parades with fishnet stockings and false eyelashes on 'men'....... As a matter of fact, a gay group just endorsed Romney.


Would you not have escorted the 'guests' in the picture out of the White House?   I am not surprised, but disheartened that the Obama people didn't do something about this. 

z

26 comments:

Always On Watch said...

From Wikipedia:

Reagan's position on gay rights has been a subject of controversy. In the late 1970s he wrote a response in his LA Herald-Examiner column to the organization backing the California Briggs Initiative, stating that he opposed the proposed ban on gay public school teachers. Reagan's daughter, Patti Davis, wrote an article in the New York Times where she recalled her father talking about Rock Hudson's homosexuality in an accepting and tolerant manner....

Also see THIS, which includes the actual essay that Reagan wrote.

conservativesonfire said...

"...but disheartened that the Obama people didn't do something about this."

Obama feels the sane way as they do.

Joe said...

The left in general, to which the majority of uncloseted gays belong, have absolutely no sense of decorum, proper display of behavior, respect (although they want it for themselves) or propriety.

The picture provides the evidence.

Ducky's here said...

Reagan is despised by most gays for good reason.

Yeah, AOW, some of his best friends were gay.

Silverfiddle said...

The Obama's have really brought class to the White House, haven't they?

This is a disgrace.

Anonymous said...

A good friend is Chicago emailed yesterday that the Gay Parade was going to go pass the Cathedral when mass was being celebrated. The Cardinal protested very strongly & their plans were changed. They certainly do know how to win friends & influence people. Personally, I don't care what they do, but don't try to force it on others. As my Pol. Science professer at USC said many years ago, 'Your (their) freedom ends where my nose begins'.

Silvrlady

Speedy G said...

Babs Streissand blames Reagan for the death from AIDS of her gay son...

...because what her son was doing wasn't wrong, but Reagan's inability to identify and pull a cure straight out of his *ss was....

Speedy G said...

Reagan is despised by most gays for good reason.

In case you were wondering... those were ducky's "good reasons" for gays hating Reagan... that, and the fact that Ron Sr. never showed up at Ron Jr.s ballet performances with the Joffrey.

Z said...

AOW, what Reagan wrote is fascinating. Also fascinating is "why did it disappear and this guy had to go to the Library of Congress to find out how understanding of homosexuality Reagan was?" Don't tell me CENSORSHIP started back THEN?

Z said...

Conservativesonfire: Yes, he would give the finger to Reagan, too. WHy wouldn't he, with his childhood, his background, his mentors, his Harvard days and Chicago? Yes, he would. How sad.

Joe, I think we should blame the bad behavior more on leftwingers than their gayness, I agree..

Ducky, actually, I think some of his best friends WERE gay,your slam doesn't really work here.
No American should do what they did...hate him or not, you try to hide the point...again.

SF...truly a disgrace.

Z said...

Speedy...everything was Reagan's fault and THEN it was Bush's fault..

Do you know I didn't know Ron Jr was gay until recently from a friend who knew him? And, of course, who gives a darn?

Speedy G said...

Exactly.

Pris said...

That picture is so disgusting. Gays demand respect because they're gay, but the Presidency doesn't?

Give me a break!

Leticia said...

Absolute disrespect of the White House and our presidents.

I wouldn't have had them escorted out, I would have tossed them out on their rumps! And would hope they were terribly bruised for a few days.

And for Obama to ignore this blatant and vile behavior goes to show you how much he doesn't care about the White House, and this nation.

Z said...

Leticia, and I don't know about you, but putting our feet on the wooden furniture in our house, or any furniture, wasn't permitted...we learned respect for those who asked us not to and respect for our surroundings.

Have you seen the email going around of Obama with about 10 photos of his feet, in shoes, on the coffee table, on the conference table !!, on his desk, etc? On the conference table!
I suppose nobody ever told him better, but wouldn't you THINK?...

Which president wouldn't go into the Oval Office without a jacket and tie on? I think they ALL put their feet up on their desk ONCE in a while...but on the conference table?
It's not important in comparison to the bills he's sneaking by, etc., but the image says a LOT about him.

Kid said...

Reagan caused AIDS? If you answer Yes, Shoot yourselves now. Use a BB gun and fire 1000 times or as many times as you can before expiring.

Who caused Cancer? Parkinson's disease?, ALS? and that horrible thing called Restless Leg Syndrome? Huh?

Looks folks, I caused AIDS. I invented it in my combination Uranium/Cobolt 60 processing plant and Disease Research and Development Center in a little place called Conservative Heaven, Tennessee.

Now stop blaming President Ronald Reagan for stuff he was never involved with.
Ronald Reagan even with a severely debilitating disease such as Alzheimers was still a sextillion times the president and achiever of all the libtard presidents put together - speaking platonically of course. No homo-eroticism here folks. Now move along.

Rita said...

My gay friends are all conservative. I seriously doubt the majority of gays would approve of such behavior. These idiots are the radical left full of hate.

Z said...

Rita, did you see the gay group endorsing Romney in my post's link? Good stuff.

Kid, it was YOU!? "put together"...I'm laughing out loud! :-)
thanks for your terrific comment!xx

FairWitness said...

Hi Z, I hate to disagree with you, because I rarely do... But I believe the majority of LGBTs would behave in the same manner as those in the photos, if they were all honored with the privilege of private invitations to the White House. Sadly, they do not care about the country, they do not care about society, they don't care about squat EXCEPT bitching about how discriminatory our country is against them. Their entire lives are about their sexual orientation and they couldn't care less about anything else. They hate heterosexuals, especially Republican ones.

Ed Bonderenka said...

Of course, sexual orientation should not be an issue here.
Nobody of any stripe should be allowed to behave that way in that place by their host. If someone did that in my house they'd be shown the door.
It reflects on their host more than them.

Law and Order Teacher said...

Z,
Yeah, this isn't a matter of gays or whatever. It's a matter of respect for the president and the White House. Both of which don't matter to these people. With rights comes responsibilities. These people demand "rights" but don't want the responsibility of civility and tolerance. Sorry for them I think. I guess the tolerance is all on our side.

Z said...

FW, I think a lot of gays don't feel this way and are humiliated by these types of things and gay parades, etc. Maybe not the majority, but a LOT. I don't know any really effeminate gay men. Okay, except some past hair dressers of mine!

Ed and L&O, this is totally not about sexual orientation, you're right...it's disrespect and dishonoring US by doing that in the WH.
I just can't IMAGINE a president whose people wouldn't have carted them out, but he couldn't lower the standard this far by welcoming only LGBT people and then throw them out! All that "let's get the gay vote" for nothing? Not Obama.

beakerkin said...

Political Incorrect Warning

Most of us really do not care who sleeps with whom so long as all parties are adults and consent. The real truth is within the gay community is a nasty bunch of shrill
activists. These are the same people
who interupt church services while
th Church was treating AIDS patients
at its hospitals.

The progress of gay rights happened
when mainstream people looked at the gay people they encountered in their lives. Other than some minor quirks they were just ordinary people at the next desk or next door. The antics of the shrill left loons like the group ranting about Reagan long after he died never conrtibuted anything towards the promotion of gay rights. In fact their antics hurt their cause more than they ever grasped.

Z said...

Beak, so well said. I couldn't agree with you more. This is AGENDA, not ORIENTATION.
I like to think there were articles by gays in magazines condemning those who did this. Their actions have NOTHING to do with what most homosexuals would do in the people's house...you are so right.

beakerkin said...

Actually it is about a distinct lack of class.

Tom's Place said...

Classy, classy, classy people...they are not.