How can people even consider this outrageous claim? Here's a part of the video that only lasts a couple of minutes, so I'd watch it if I were you: "My gut feeling is this was deliberate, this was deliberately done in order to put the Obama Administration in such a vice grip that it's impossible to get anything done. To raise so much fear -- this is what Republicans do, this is what they do." Mike Malloy, Liberal Talk Show Host
Thursday, January 7, 2010
The Christmas Day Terror Attempt was the REPUBLICANS, dontchaknow?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
35 comments:
When your brain is completely zombified by class-struggle ideology (idiotology?) it becomes impossible for a member of a recognized victim class to be guilty of anything.
Geez, I haven't listened to Malloy since he started hooking up with 9/11 conspiracy theorists.
He's still crazy, the left wing Glenn Beck.
No, Ducky, no rightwinger says things like this. Don't even try to mention insults to the Left; this isn't close to anything that benign and you know it.
Glenn Beck? Mike Malloy? Hardly.
I'm still waiting for the WH to try to negate ONE of Beck's stories...so far,nothing.
Funny, the Left's so scared of Palin they can't stop insulting her but Beck? Not so much; kind of scared to shake the hornet's nest of truth, I imagine.
Nice try, though.
Shoprat, imagine? It's the Right. Zombified isn't even IN it.
Cuckoo!
Cuckoo!
I'd compare him more to Alex Jones then. Not Glenn Beck.
You can't insult the Messiah!
Good grief! How does one respond to insanity? One doesn't.
Pris
Embarass??
A deliberate attempt to embarass the Obama Administration??
Since when was it possible to embarass any of that crowd, anyway?
This guy's an embarassment to even suggest that anyone would attempt killing hundreds of innocent people in order to embarass Obama.
Talk about being deranged, this guy takes the cake!
One must love Obama a certain amount to think that others could hate him a certain amount. Kill hundreds of innocent people just to embarrass Obama? That's some big hate. Project that onto others? That's some big love.
cuh-ray-zee
I knew somebody would come up with this. It is just disgusting. Trying to cover up for their FAILURE.
Glenn Beck has done a tremendous job of research, connecting the dots politically speaking, and is doing a great job educating Americans.
Debbie
Right Truth
http://www.righttruth.typepad.com
Sadly, his listeners probably swerved off the road in the midst of their enlightenment.
they are sicker than words can say my friend..
Hey Mike: maybe it's the Tooth Fairy pissed off because of the fall of the dollar!
Duckmeister nailed it: a loon.
BZ
Moonbat, perfect term for this idiot.
The left (read Ducky) always try to project things like this on to the right. Notice the Duck, as usual, did not offer any examples. Just his usual baseless accusations.
Yes, you see, this is what Republicans live for.
Embarassing the great new cool black president, see. Just like the Republicans and George Bush deliberately got hurricanes to head to New Orleans to destroy black folks, right??
Deliberate sub par work on levees and so forth.
Deliberate plots to give AIDS to Black People.
All part of the big plan.
WVDOTTR
Wow. And people actually believe this. Wow. I wonder if Malloy believes it?
Very astute observation, WV Dotter!
We've been divided, and we're very nearly conquered, because so many dwell on manufactured allegations of this kind, and cling to them like home and mother.
I have serious problems with Glenn Becks' STYLE -- I think it's strident, tasteless, and self-defeating. I don't like being constantly SHOUTED AT as though I were a retarded 3-year old, and he DOES that ALL THE TIME.
HOWEVER, Glenn does not MANUFACTURE evidence. Most of the time he skewers the leftists with videotapes of their OWN words which invariably prove them to be shameless liars and insensitive fools.
If Beck would develop some DIGNITY and treat his audience like adults, I believe he'd be far more effective in fulfilling his mission.
Unfortunately,by playing the clown and always bearing down hard on the OBVIOUS GB really DOES make it all too easy for his opponents to characterize him as "crazy."
~ FreeThinke
Glenn Beck is as subtle as someone waving then drawing the pin from a hand grenade in a crowded theater.
~ FreeThinke
BTW, notice the calm, almost hesitant style of this leftist creep.
Once upon a time the LEFT did all the screaming.
Now that OUR side has caught on and has been using LEFTIST tactics against the left, the left -- as full of guile as the Serpent in Genesis -- is toning DOWN.
There's no SINCERITY in any of this. It's TACTICAL in the left's endless struggle to gain absolute power.
~ FreeThinke
This guy is just a shock jock. The super-secret tea bag mossad should eliminate him.
That's one wild theory to be sure. But lest we forget, Dick Cheney and the other party loyalists all to quick to take snipes at the Obama administration for their failings with regards to this most recent terror plot would do well to recall that it was in fact the prior administration's revamped and retooled post 9/11 airline security policy which was at work on that very day.
This is NOT to say that the Obama administration doesn't bear culpability in the plot.
Objectivity....we could use a bit more of it for sure.
Never underestimate the stupidity of liberals.
I just can't stand watching Obama he is an arrogant liar, and an egotistical person
Soapbox, so it's a coincidence that it's during Obama's admin that the terror attacks are stepping up again? Or that Russia, China, N Korea and Iraq are all getting even bolder as the latest terror attack attempts on our soil?
I'd blame Congress more than I'd blame Bush/Cheney and I'm not at all uncritical of Bush on many counts. And I'd blame Clinton for beginning with the closing of so many military bases....
The problem is we have to stop BLAMING and fighting with each other while terrorists and terror regimes are licking their chops watching America put their news cycles and selling ad space and feeling they need to expose every single detail of every battle before actually DOING ANYTHING to protect ourselves..>And, of course, there's political correctness which none of the Islamist countries have but we have enough to be the end of us.
Comparing Malloy's outrageous and unsubstantiated claims to Beck's well-researched claims is wrong.
I may not like Beck's style (he tends to yell a lot), but he doesn't make up lies like Malloy obviously did in this example.
"Soapbox, so it's a coincidence that it's during Obama's admin that the terror attacks are stepping up again?"
Stepping up again? Seriously????
If you would cut through the anti-Obama partisan BS, you'd find that even with the added anti-terrorism measures implemented by the Bush administration following 9/11, there were nearly two dozen attempted terrorist attacks.
You want to make the case for them having been thwarted with Bush at the helm vs. this Christmas attempt just simply going wrong, I'd agree with that being a fair point. But any argument based on the sheer number of attempts doesn't have much of a leg to stand on.
Soapbox, 2 dozen? I would like to see your reference for this claim please.
As far as terrorist attacks under Obama we had the Christmas Day instance in which our federal government, led by Obama, got lucky because the moron caught his pants on fire and the shooting at Fort Hood.
The shooting at Fort Hood was a terrorist attack, it occured on Obama's watch, it was a miss by his "intelligence" people.
When we talk about attacks this one seems to be conveniently left out.
I find it stunning that we are not calling it what it was, a terrorist attack on US soil. This has been made even more clear because of the developing connections, which Obama's "intelligence" people were unable to make, between the Fort Hood shotter and the crotch bomber.
How about this Chuck:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335500,00.html
Lest we forget, one of the most significant of these was on December 22, 2001 in which case Richard Reid (aka shoe bomber) attempted to blow up a plane originating in Paris. Similarly, this plot was not foiled in so much as the bomb simply failed.
I think it's ludicrous to ignore what I wrote about countries like China and Iraq and N Korea HUGELY building up their militaries and harp on shoe bombers as seemingly the only 'terror' America faces.
My point is that those countries weren't quite as willing to flex their muscles until Obama started showing that we are softer on terror than Bush was.
Anybody who doesn't think that isn't listening or is such an Obama fan that it, as it has with so many, blinds him from the truth.
So it's the VRWC eh. You know that's one more thing the leftards have in common with muslim savages in the middle east.
A paranoid belief that your opponents are hiding in the closet, fiddling in your computer and under your bed screwing you over from your glorious destiny.
"Anybody who doesn't think that isn't listening or is such an Obama fan that it, as it has with so many, blinds him from the truth."
The "truth" my friend is that these two parties are not altogether different. They'd love to have you believe that in fact they are. And while it is true their methodologies are different, their destination is the same; Statism.
soapbox, you know they're not altogether different (though in so many points, the Right wins MY affections) when the RNC bigwigs are calling Steele down for hoping the party goes more MODERATE, which, of course, is telling the Left we don't think they're all wrong. Let me cut/paste an email from my bright friend Mike in Indiana:
"Steele seems to be finally getting the correct message, which is the country is in shock over what the left can and is doing to them. The idea of moderating that message is to somewhat condone the policies of the left by saying they are not totally wrong only moderately wrong."
I agree. Steele seemed to be getting squishy a few months back and lost me, but I'm back now. If he talks tough and gets CONSERVATISM (bordering in Libertarian) bigger in the platform, I'll be on him like white on rice.
No where but in Washington is talk so cheap. Be wary. Be very very wary.
Soapbox, your joking right?
There is one incident of an actual attempt. The rest are incidences of Bush doing a wonderful job.
Compare that one incident (Richard Reid) in seven and half years with one terrorist attack (Fort Hood) and a lucky miss in less than a year. Obama's presidency is looking more like Bill Clinton's record of continous terrorist attacks than Bush's one attack in 8 years.
The number of Islamic terror attacks around the world has increased exponentially since 9/11/2001. Most of which is Muslim on Muslim violence, but the increase has been sharp:
A full one-third of that number has been under Obama's presidency's first year.
This speaks directly to Obama's alternate approach to "fighting" the "war on terror."
Maybe there's something to be said for having Islamic terrorists marginalize themselves by killing fellow Muslims, but it's not a tenable situation long-term.
That we've been attacked on US soil, twice, by Islamic terrorists under Obama's FBI's alleged monitoring is telling as a thing in itself.
No politics here, just truth.
Obama's "counter-terrorism efforts" suck.
Chuck and Beamish....why couldn't I say all that as well? Thanks, guys.
Post a Comment